That is a hard question, billyboy.
We know from so many things that the society only used things that suits them. Other opinions and facts are completely ignored. So, I would not think that those video's are 100% honest, or without bias.
But then some of the doctors in those videos are probably respected doctors. It is difficult to tell if the quotes that the WTS uses are really there whole quotes or only a part of it, and there whole overall view is not exactly the same.
There are probably some merits of non blood threatment. I would if I have the choice prefer without blood. But that is only if those would have equal probabilities of recovery.
The big problem in my view hoewever is that many witnesses think that using blood will kill you more probably then that you life. That using blood is really medical wrong, can never save your life, etc. In this way, they make ignorant deccisions, what are utmost important. That is the biggest problem with the video's.
What do you think, billyboy?