First of all Ricki, you don't even know me .. please refrain from rubbing yourself in my thread Jeremiah.
Apologies, Monkey. But I'm not posting comments exclusively for your sake. There are hundreds of members registered on this forum lurking with many more coming in by way of the link found in your testimony on Watter's site. After reading the thread, I found several statements indicating theological bankruptcy. That's not meant as an insult but a valid observation. I tend to correct it where I see it.
Also can I point out that practically 99.9% of christianity rejects a gay lifestyle .. it is looked upon as a detestable thing. I see no way that the bible can be misinterpreted as to saying anything other short of gay ppl are living in sin and will not live forever/go to heaven blah blah bling bling blah. I personally find that christianity and gaysexuality don't mix ..
I never implied that homosexuality and Christianity "mix". That is, they are not compatible with one another. My point being, Christianity is an escape from it (i.e. if you're convicted and want it). My point being, one does not have to give up homosexuality to become a Christian. Once they are a Christian then they will have a desire to give it up.
actually in general I don't think many things mix with christianity except for pointing out others flaws at your own stupid expense.
So I therefore reject the bible or the so called founding god that it's words are wrapped around. I find that the amount of good that has been done in the name of the bible is far far FAR outweighed but the disgusting BADNESS thats has been done with it.
Yet this is a fallacious argument. So if a baker, using a cookbook, bakes a cake that tastes like roasted dog, would you blame the cookbook or the one interpreting it's content?
It basically appears as if you reject Christianity on a basis other than what Christianity is all about. That is, guilt by association to those who misinterpret it, misuse it etc,. If it's objective truths are what you consider "badness" then that is simply your subjective opinion.
To be honest I don't see an awful lot of sense in it's pages .. anything good that is written in there is contradicted later on. In short - it's a feral peice of work.
I find the complete opposite and I'm able to defend that view.
In summery, all the elders did back in the days of my closetness was help to open my eyes early on .. It's not just about Jehovah's Witnesses to me .. all organised religion is full of monkey doo and I will have nothing more to do with it.
I can understand your emotionally charged view of organized religion. But it's still skewed and it would benefit you to be more open to it. If no one else is interested in my comments, I'll take my leave. Thanks for your time.