I just have to LOL. I leave, come back, and this thread monster has grown. But here is what I find perplexing.
N.Drew called Mrs. J a bitch. There was nothing ambiguous about it, and from what I could tell, no real reason for it. She simply said Mrs. J was a bitch. It was a short post and to the point. Mrs. J is a bitch.
But then Tec hears it, and thinks it must have meant something else. Because she has an opinion of N.Drew, and maybe this bit of infor does not fit in with her belief of N.Drew. That N.Drew would just call Mrs. J a bitch.
I think about the many bible discussions I have had with Tec, and it occurs to me that maybe this is just the way she processes things. The reason I repeatedly said that N.Drew call Mrs. J a bitch, is because that is what she did---no interpretation. But somehown, this very clear thought is getting lost in the preconceived notion of who N.Drew was and what she was capable of. Just like when we discuss the bible and Tec will say she does not accept certain parts, or regardless of how clear something is written, it must have meant something different.
This has been eye opening, and a little bit confusing, but I think I'm starting to understand. Things written can be changed when a person does not want to accept what is before their eyes.
N.Drew also told me F**K you, but that thread got locked. It was clear and concise----but I'm sure that won't prevent someone from arguing differently.
NC
