One situation that comes to mind here is the banning of some posters. Our most easily identifiable common experience and the most emotionally laden may be that of disfellowshipping. On a non-jw board if we were banned from posting we could expect to have a similar emotional reaction and we may make the connection between the shunning practices of the JWs. But on the other board we may be less likely to make the connection to the definition of disfellowshipping as practiced by the JWs.
Other similar triggering experiences that may elicit similar reactions might be:
- Getting fired from a job
- Getting the silent treatment from a family member, friend, or co-worker
- Ending a relationship
We may react in a similar fashion but we wouldn?t necessarily use the WT definitions to express the situation and reactions.
But here where we know people will understand our common experiences we may tend to define all our experiences and emotional reactions based on WT definitions. We are familiar with them. Sometimes we may not have the real world definitions to be able to redefine them. But doing so is essential to breaking free of the cultic controls and learning to live in the real world.
I read a while ago, and I forget where, that using the WT words/definitions acts like a trigger magnifying the responses to their controls. This makes sense to me. They programmed the words. They programmed the fears. They programmed a version of reality that gave them control over us. If cultic language is a mind control mechanism then continuing to use their words for our reactions and experiences keeps us firmly in their grips.
As much as possible I try not to use JW loaded language. Even when talking to active JWs I have found that using their words for things tends to stop them from thinking (which it is exactly what it is supposed to do). So if we are trying to break free of their controls it makes sense that we stop using their words for things to describe our real world experiences. And I think we need to do that with how we define our present experiences here.
Now that may be confusing but let me explain. The WTS has disfellowshipped me. That is how they see me. That is the past experience and how they treat me most probably won?t change. But if for some reason people here chose to ban me for some reason, then stating that I am Dfed from the board keeps me under WTS influence. I continue to define my experience by WT defintions. Doing this will only magnify my emotional reactions to the situation.
For those of us who are shunned by active JWs, few of us ever got an opportunity to be heard about what had happened. And for some kind of closure to happen it is essential that we find some way to express our feelings. The WTS society denies this.
Then something happens here and we are banned from posting for a while. And we react to it. But often our reactions may be magnified because we never got to express our feelings about the WT banning. So the present not only holds the feelings for the present situation but also may hold the feelings from the past. And since we were not allowed to complain about the original situation we may find that having an opportunity here to discuss our feelings we may find that our anger for both the past and present situation is poured out on the present situation. This may result in some resolution of the present situation but does nothing to deal with the original hurt.
People may find that this kind of experience occurrs frequently. Or that their reactions are getting worse. Until the original hurt is resolved it can become one of those experiences that relives itself until real resolution to the original hurt is found.
And sadly because for so many of us the original hurt, shunning, is an on-going problem in our lives it becomes difficult to get resolution.