uncle_onion
JoinedTopics Started by uncle_onion
-
3
C14 #6
by uncle_onion in"the moon is slowly receding for the earth at about 4 centimeters (1.5 inches) per year, and this rate would have been greater in the past.
but even if the moon had started receding from being in contact with the earth, it would have taken only 1.37 billion years to reach its present distance from the earth.
this gives a maximum age of the moon, not the actual age.
-
1
C14 #5
by uncle_onion inthe thesis said:.
the earth's magnetic field has been decaying so fast that it looks like it is less than 10,000 years old.
rapid reversals during the flood year and fluctuations shortly after would have caused the field energy to drop even faster.[29].
-
4
C14 #4
by uncle_onion inthe thesis said:.
red blood cells and hemoglobin have been found in some (unfossilized!
) dinosaur bone.
-
1
C14 #3
by uncle_onion inthe thesis said:.
many physical evidences contradict the "billions of years".
of the methods that have been used to estimate the age of the earth, 90 percent point to an age far less than the billions of years asserted by evolutionists.
-
3
c14 #2
by uncle_onion inthe thesis said:.
carbon dating in many cases seriously embarrasses evolutionists by giving ages that are much younger than those expected from their model of early history.
a specimen older than 50,000 years should have too little 14c to measure.. laboratories that measure 14c would like a source of organic material with zero 14c to use as a blank to check that their lab procedures do not add 14c.
-
1
c14 #1
by uncle_onion inthe thesis said:.
there are many examples where the dating methods give "dates" that are wrong for rocks of known age.
one example is k-ar "dating" of five historical andesite lava flows from mount nguaruhoe in new zealand.
-
3
C14 intro
by uncle_onion ini have been doing some research on c14 dating.
i thought the "simplest" way to check it out would be to read a thesis on why it is "wrong" and then research these arguements and see if they are wanting.the thesis is at http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html.
i will post the different points and hopefully we can get a few good threads going.. 1. the thesis makes the point that because the flood occured, the carbon in different materials would be as it is now.
-
6
dateline show?
by uncle_onion ini apologise if i am going over old ground here but i have heard through the grapevine that there is going to be a dateline show about the gb?.
can anyone confirm this and what is dateline?.
uo
-
25
WERE ANIMALS MEANT TO BE VEGGYS?
by uncle_onion ini would be very interested in any creationalists response to genesis 1:30 where the bible tells us that all animals wre originallly vegetarians.. why aren't they vegetarians now?
what about gnats who only live on blood?.
this to me brings up a lot of issues that can not be answered.
-
8
C14 AND EARLY MAN
by uncle_onion inin my quest to find an inner peace i have done a lot of research on early man and how his story fits in with the bible.
this research has also gone into c14 carbon dating.. i asked the website www.bibleanswers.com a question on this and have posted the replys below.
i would appreciate you having a look at the links especially the audio links and posting your replys on what you agree and disagree with.. thanks a lot.. uo.