1) The really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/)
From philosophical transactions of the Royal Society: "The mammalian Y chromosome is thus likely to be engaged in a battle in which is is outgunned by its opponent. A logical consequence is that the Y should run away and hide, shedding any transcribed sequences that are not essential to its function."
However when the Y chromosome is expressed during mammalian development the result is anatomical dominance.
Conclusion: Each gender has its own arena of supremacy.
Many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection ... 2) The powerful majority subsist at the mercy of a few rich people. In the US many feel it is 99 vs 1%
You are confusing Biological evolution with Universal Darwinism.
Now if you were to directly compare these apples and pears you will see how inappropriate your comparison is. The US as a nation has existed 239 years of which the vast imbalance in US wealth has only occurred within the last 40. Biological evolution has been in progress for 3.5 billion years and you're trying to measure evolutionary progress within the last 0.0000001142 % of process time elapsed.
Now some questions for you:
Why do you equate the existence of God with whether evolution is true or not?
Why do you insist on a literal interpretation of Genesis with two naked teenagers in a botanical garden and a talking snake?