well, here we go with "dracula" again!
( massimo introvigne).. .
breaking: jehovah's witnesses have hired known cult apologist massimo introvigne to write a 21-page "expert opinion" defending the witnesses for their child abuse mishandling.
Atlantis / Petra ,can you provide any definitive proof / verification that WT / JW have actually done this ?
I find it hard to believe myself . { but stranger things have happened }
And I am sorry ,what do you mean by "WT is messing with that dracula dude again"
What am i missing here ?
Pardon my ignorance .
well, here we go with "dracula" again!
( massimo introvigne).. .
breaking: jehovah's witnesses have hired known cult apologist massimo introvigne to write a 21-page "expert opinion" defending the witnesses for their child abuse mishandling.
As I said on the other site I have a problem believing this post ,i would want verification from a couple of reliable sources before i would make any further comments.
why the jehovah's go full on the legal organ .
the jehovah's witnesses do not accept the results of scientific research under any circumstances.
they go to court again.
Another excellent video from this man Eric Wilson
“A lawsuit is a win-win situation for them. If they win, it is because of Jehovah's blessing, and if they lose, they can portray themselves as martyrs, as persecuted; in line with Bible apostles who were persecuted by the state for their beliefs and beliefs. "
Now that Jehovah's Witnesses have not been able to stop the report of the abuse report, they are taking further legal action.
What have they got to hide going to all of this expense hiring lawyers to defend their interpretation of scripture in a court of law.
And donations from JW`s are used for this grandstanding.
And not furthering the preaching work of the Good News of Jesus Kingdom.
"must" release such guilty members to punishment .
watchtower 1962, november 15th, pg.-693, par.-9-10.
“9 worldly authorities render a judgment and punish persons, whether they are inside the congregation or outside, if they violate the laws of decency and good order.
I wonder if the ARC was given this information from that WT of 1962 ? I hope it was.
from a member of the board asking for this to be posted.. hi.
i'm pimo.
could you please let people know about this?
I wouldn`t be at all surprised if that was the case Petra ,their are a few Televangelists that do alright and they would start with a core base to build on as the R&F will swallow anything the GB says.
here, in the us, we go to the "bathroom".
am i taking a bath?
we either poop or pee.. when we go to canada, we go to the "washroom".
Aussies like to take a crap and a whiz as they go to the loo.
the abc is a government owned media group, and today's web-page included this story:.
its formatted as answers to specific questions, and in response to the question, "why did you stop believing" comes a story we hear much too often.. the special thing about the story this time is that likely millions of australian will read her story.. https://www.abc.net.au/life/i-dont-want-to-be-a-jehovahs-witness-anymore-or-lose-my-family/11885098.
the article also reminds us that australians are giving up on religion in increasing numbers.. quote: "it seems australians are increasingly giving up on god — or at least religion.. on the last census in 2016, nearly a third of australians (30 per cent) reported they had 'no religion' — the highest number of people ever to do so, and up 11 per cent on 2006.".
Is it going to be aired on TV ? if so do you have a time and date ?
from a member of the board asking for this to be posted.. hi.
i'm pimo.
could you please let people know about this?
on 14 november 2018, australian-based barristers david bennett ac, qc and james gibson presented to watchtower australia and the jehovah’s witnesses organisation their commissioned review and opinion on the findings and recommendations of the royal commission into the institutional responses to child sexual abuse as it related to jehovah’s witnesses.. .
the review entitled “review of the commission’s investigation into jehovah’s witnesses and its ensuing reports” was divided into four parts, as follows:.
part one considered the history and powers of royal commissions in general.. .
David Bennet also defended Scientology and was instrumental in getting them recognised as a bona fide religion.
Is it fair and reasonable to dismiss his legal opinion just because it was commissioned by Watchtower?
Yes ,is it fair and reasonable to dismiss his legal opinion just because it was commissioned by Scientology ?
slimboyfat If you pay people they will tell you what you want to hear. What’s the point?
some time ago i came across this quote claiming to be from a watchtower publication;.
1953 –“bible chronology also fixes the time for christ's second presence and the assuming of his right to rule as at 1914; this date was published in the watchtower as early as 1879, 35 years before 1914.” (tscp 3).
this is of course misleading, for while the date was indeed published in watchtowers from the very beginning, christ’s second presence and his becoming king were not assigned to that year until many years after (1933 and 1922 respectively, to be precise)..
The Watchtower /Governing Body /Jehovah`s Witnesses are notorious for re-writing their own history .
In other words lying about their past statements.
And to quote their own words that they apply to others and in this case applys to them John 8:44
"You are from your father the devil......He did not stand fast in the truth,because truth is not in him.when he speaks the lie he speaks according to his own disposition because he is a liar and the father of the lie.
And when JW/G.B.W.T. lie about their past history they show who their God really is.
