Straight from thehorse'sGB's mouth
Stephen Lett's lips make me think of a camel or giraffe, not a horse. Although, what comes out of it makes me think more about the other end of the horse...
straight from the horse's gb's mouth - from the 2022 convention broadcast.. it's at the 38 min.
30 secs.
point of the jw broadcast: https://www.jw.org/en/library/videos/#en/mediaitems/2022convention/pub-co-r22_1_video.
Straight from thehorse'sGB's mouth
Stephen Lett's lips make me think of a camel or giraffe, not a horse. Although, what comes out of it makes me think more about the other end of the horse...
original reddit post (removed).
I get the impression that he did plenty of snorkeling without getting anywhere near the water...
the expression "jehovah god" has always seemed strange to me.
even when i was a jw, i found the term awkward, and never used it myself.
both words are nouns intended to be synonyms of each other, unless the name "jehovah" is being used as an adjective, which is also weird.
CompuServe was the first message board I used, I think, back in late 1990 or 1991. There was software that could automate the process of downloading messages and uploading replies, so you only had to pay for the few minutes it took to do those, and you could read and reply while offline. So it was relatively inexpensive. I do remember that they charged more if you connected at a higher bit rate. So for live chat, you'd connect at 300 baud. For downloads/uploads, 2400 baud.
I don't know if I could live without broadband now.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Kamala Harris: "If you are a parent of sons, do think about what this means for the life of your son and what that will mean in terms of the choices he will have."
The Vice President is worried that young men will no longer be able to run around, humping every girl in sight anymore. No longer will it only be rich male athletes finding themselves having to support eleven children from eight different women.
This is what she takes away from the SCOTUS decision...
this abc (a national government owned media group) report states:.
"for the first time, fewer than half of australians identified as christian, though christianity remained the nation's most common religion (declared by 43.9 per cent of the population).. meanwhile, the number of australians who said they had no religion rose to 38.9 per cent (from 30.1 per cent in 2016).".
read more?
I was thinking the same thing. Wouldn't that mean that 61.1% are believers?
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Taking it one step further, some religious beliefs extend to banning birth control. If we are having an honest conversation about life here, where do we draw the line?
I see that as a separate issue, though a valid one. I think that one affects married couples mostly, since those same religions are usually very strict about pre-marital sex. But I think it's an example of the ways in which religious rules and customs can make situations much more complicated than they need to be. The notion that sex should be attempted only when one wishes to procreate betrays a deep misunderstanding of how powerful the sex drive is (and how inefficient sex can actually be at producing viable young).
So, I agree, the approach that says that you cannot try to prevent pregnancy and that you cannot end a pregnancy promotes a view of sex as purely a tool for population growth that must be managed and controlled in ways that would normally not allow for the kind of emotional investment a pair of loving human beings can't help but feel.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Well, that's one way to solve the problem.
original reddit post (removed).
He's reading a book about GOD?
Not quite, assuming it is the book God: An Anatomy by Francesca Stavrakopoulou. From the description on its Amazon page:
Here is a portrait—arrived at through the author's close examination of and research into the Bible—of a god in ancient myths and rituals who was a product of a particular society, at a particular time, made in the image of the people who lived then, shaped by their own circumstances and experience of the world.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Its easy for a conservative middle aged, middle classed man to tell a young woman how she should live her life. Now imagine if you were that young woman of 16 or 17 with that decision weighing on you because you made a bad choice.
I'm not sure that's a good example. If that man was the father of that young woman, I'd wager that the reason for any problem is the fact that he did not offer her guidance, counsel, or advice on sex. It's a common problem here, especially with religious families (and more so with fundamentalists); they are uncomfortable discussing sex with their teenaged children, assuming that if they outright forbid it, that will be enough.
Nor would I necessarily trust a 16/17-year-old to handle such a situation well by themselves, seeing as they have very little life experience (something their parents do have, seeing as they have had at least one child). Leaving her to make that decision --and live with the consequences-- all by herself is not ideal, in my opinion. But this is another problem with a clear solution that is nonetheless fraught-- teach sex ed in schools, and ask parents to discuss these issues with their children. Find some way to impress on the most anti-abortion parents to take the lead in helping to reduce the issue by doing something they seem to dread- talking about sex with their children.
Now, if you are comparing a woman in her 20s or 30s with that middle-aged man, your point is much stronger. I wouldn't necessarily dismiss the concerns or thoughts of the man, but I would place the woman's experience far higher when considering the issue.
scene: the new world, any minute now.... billy bastard, an aborted fetus is resurrected and immediately dies because he is outside the womb of a birthing person.. repeat ad infinitum.
God could solve this by having those beings resurrected in grown-up human bodies. You'll know who they are, they'll be curled up on the ground screaming and immediately latch on to the first nipple that comes within range.
'Resurrection Day' will be memorable for a lot of the wrong reasons...