Yet the bizarre thing is that they have also instructed the R&F to be ready obey any directions "whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not" and may not "appear practical from a human standpoint". (WT 2013 11/15). This direction is described as "life-saving".
The same paragraph implores witnesses to put their trust in the GB above anything else.
Now they are making it clear their decisions could be wrong, could be mistaken. Can they really expect blind obedience in every case? I wonder how the R&F will square this circle?
.....
Sorry - I forgot. The conclusion that the two positions are logically mutually exclusive will simply be ignored.