This is worth 100 incidents of making a scene in a KH and 1000 protests outside a convention.
It would be great if it was linked to from some other sites like jwleaks, jwsurvey etc.
It's time limited but I wonder if it's possible to get it extended?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05r3srd.
deborah frances-white - online.. .
spot on - and funny..
This is worth 100 incidents of making a scene in a KH and 1000 protests outside a convention.
It would be great if it was linked to from some other sites like jwleaks, jwsurvey etc.
It's time limited but I wonder if it's possible to get it extended?
so this saturday we are going to have some kind of videolink speech, by a james mantz from headquarters apparantly.
how very exciting... or not.
thats what my mum said anyway, and i just thought like " yeah right" i can t remember we have ever had it before, is it a new take?
Yup, three hour streamed show next Saturday pm. What fun.
so this saturday we are going to have some kind of videolink speech, by a james mantz from headquarters apparantly.
how very exciting... or not.
thats what my mum said anyway, and i just thought like " yeah right" i can t remember we have ever had it before, is it a new take?
there was a statue outside the rhodes university.
a 30 year old black student then threw his pooh on the statue and that got the ball rolling to pull the statue down.
the board of this university built also gives out burseries and grants to previously disadvantaged black south africans and not disadvantaged black south africans.. there has been a huge debate in the country and now the statue has been removed.
Interesting BBC op-ed
there was a statue outside the rhodes university.
a 30 year old black student then threw his pooh on the statue and that got the ball rolling to pull the statue down.
the board of this university built also gives out burseries and grants to previously disadvantaged black south africans and not disadvantaged black south africans.. there has been a huge debate in the country and now the statue has been removed.
http://www.revealnews.org/article/california-court-guts-child-abuse-ruling-against-jehovahs-witnesses/.
california court guts child abuse ruling against jehovahs witnesses.
topics: religion / religion and government .
The point about duty to warn the congregation is covered in the court documents:
https://jwleaks.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/04-13-2015-appeals-court-final-decision-a136641.pdf
Check page 12 onwards - there is several pages of legal reasoning.
The punitive damages were based on the duty to warn the congregation. Since the ruling was there was no LEGAL duty to warn the congregation then the punitive damages were removed.
When you real the documentation you can see why this was not upheld and what the broader implications are should this duty have been established as a legal responsibility.
Of course, this does affect the MORAL responsibility to protect the congregation as far as is possible. It does not mean that some policy cannot be formulated that helps protect the congregation as much as possible from the risk of child molestation without exposing the congregation to the broader implications of a duty to protect from the risk of one congregation member committing a crime of any sort against another.
It is bizarre that the WTS is so ready to spout on about when things, such as building projects, have been done to a standard way beyond that required by the law yet on this matter seem only too happy to go only as far as the law requires them to go and not implement the best practice that so many other organisations have adopted.
i'm not an expert but that is my understanding of this: .
opinion filed.. (signed published) the judgment against defendants on the negligence count is affirmed.
the judgment against watchtower on the cause of action for punitive damages is reversed with directions to enter judgment for watchtower on punitive damages.
Err... dislike on my post?
I don't object to anyone's opinion but I posted straight out of WT publications. I'll happily discuss the disconnect between what the WTS says to it's publishers (the clue is in the name) and elders compared to how it presented the ministry to the courts.
in one of the biggest about-faces in watchtower history, in a 2002 question from readers it was admitted that the great crowd is indeed in the temple itself (naos) in revelation 7. .
but notice the statement bolded below from that article comparing the great crowd to the proselytes in ancient israel.
the statement is made that the proselytes "submitted to the law covenant.
Gotta agree with fukitol on the swallowing the spin.
Most of the R&F have NO problem accepting the WTS view of the new covenant. It's not even that illogical as at least they can spin scriptures rather than pure rhetoric as with the overlapping generations.
As for increasing numbers of partakers... no one seems that bothered. Many have forgotten or were never exposed to the buzz around looking at the decreasing numbers 20+ years ago and simply say we can't say who is and who isn't.
I have tried over and over again to get through to my wife on these points and as open and liberal as she seems to be, all of this simply is water off a ducks back.
when asked, my mom denies that they do.... do local congregations pass along gossip or reports on householders in the area?
specifically, i am wondering if they might report on (unbaptized) family members that live in other towns?.
since the abrupt ending of my bs with miss k, i have not heard from the jw's at all.
Communication exists at all levels.
There is formal communication between elders such as when people move congregations and letters of recommendation (or not) are sent.
If one is DF'ed/DA'ed and well known in an area then this will be communicated. It is not unknown for an announcement to be made in another congregation such as when an individual spends time or has lots of family/associates in another congregation
There is informal communication on a semi-official basis - two elders discussing a situation over the phone for example. You can bet your life that the guys going into halls in Kent and disrupting the meetings (see YouTube) have been talked about between bodies of elders in the area, perhaps even with letters and announcements in the congregations.
There is gossip between elders
There is gossip and natural social chit chat about third parties between friends and acquaintances in congregations.
You can be sure that if you are well known in an area and developing a reputation for some kind of lack of spirituality then your name will be coming up in conversation at some level.
i'm not an expert but that is my understanding of this: .
opinion filed.. (signed published) the judgment against defendants on the negligence count is affirmed.
the judgment against watchtower on the cause of action for punitive damages is reversed with directions to enter judgment for watchtower on punitive damages.
Twelve reasons to go out, including it is commanded...
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/202012205?q=reasons+for+preaching&p=par
What happens if you do not preach? It has organisational implications. You become "inactive". You are no longer "approved". You no longer qualify for "privileges of service".
Check out the Index on "Meeting for Field Service"
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200273747
Not much of this is available on-line but I bet the list itself shows that there are activities for preaching arranged by the congregation. Indeed there is a "Service Overseer". Tools (publications, carts etc.) are provided. Territories are assigned. Records of activity are kept and used to gauge spirituality.
According to the Shepherd book....
- the responsibility of of the Group Overseer is to take an "active interest in the spirituality of each person in the field service group", "concentrating on those who are weak, irregular in...field activty, ... or inactive", "assists each one in the group to have a regular, meaningful and joyful share in the ministry". p23-24
- signs of spiritual weakness includes neglecting "regular participation in field service (Acts 20:18-21)". p48
- the Service Overseer "motivates others to have a full share", p20
- he also has to arrange the meetings for field service and make sure there is plenty of literature and campaigns are resourced properly. p20-21
- the Congregation Service Committee "assigns publishers to field service groups after consulting with group overseers involved". p22
- a longtime inactive one is "invited to share again in the ministry" only after two elders have determined if he "meets the basic requirements to serve as a publisher", as outlined on pages 79-81 of the Organised book and km 11/00 QB. p52
If you look at the articles associated with all congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses in the UK as charities you will see there is a statement about organising preaching activity.
OK, no one is disfellowshipped for not going on the ministry but we all know that
- it's highly organised
- there is constant pushing to do as much as possible from the platform under the guise of it's a command from God and is reflection of our love for him
- social pressure to conform and do as much as possible
- social exclusion if you are perceived as weak through not doing field service
- loss of status and privileges if field service activity is low
- they might term it personal but that's not the same as independent