Is it because you are not aware of recent developments in origin-of-life science?
No. It's because the rest of your argument is based on a hypothetical where you project your biases and disdain for the opposing view. There's no real substance added with this post other than it just being a starting point for the ever going origin of life debate, which I know you love being a part of, but, usually your posts are substantive.
Another thread outlining the latest developments in bio-genesis research would have been much more instructive and constructive.