tons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
double edge,
a) you crossed out bush and replaced it with kerry not realising that this is contradicting the very essence of hillaries statement (which is she does not side with either team).
b) just like with the JWs against the rest of the world...the truth lies out there and one side is closer to it than the other (MUCH CLOSER!)!
tons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
dubla,
it is not surprising simon is loosing his temper. this is like a discussion with JWs about religion. from an outsiders perspective it is just mind blowing that people can still adhere to their faith in the US gov. after what bush et al pulled over there in iraq (not that previous govs were that much better). at one point one just wants to scream (i know how it feels...i had a JW girlfriend for over a year! )
tons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
let me get this straight.
the US mil. has not guarded the weapons depot for 1.5 years. looters were at the site until about a week ago.
Now the US gov. claims the material was removed by the russians BEFORE the war?!
how would the US mil. even know (despite a report that is as believable as the WMD reports) since they have not protected the site?
IMBECILES!
by my question, i mean, "what has any country, any group, or any individual" really done in sudan, not strictly from an interventionist stadpoint per se.
i just don't see countries besides the us take any concern as to what's happening.
does anyone really care?
africa hosts some of the most violent societies. it will take a lot of outside intervention and education of the locals to improve the situation.
teejay,
exactly! it was byrd.
i was wondering about different people on the forum.
i was raised a jw since birth but never had one ounce of spirituality.
i did the fade and have been out for years.
czar,
How many meteors have been tossed aside from hitting earth?
with people like you its no wonder democracy doesn't work too well.
by my question, i mean, "what has any country, any group, or any individual" really done in sudan, not strictly from an interventionist stadpoint per se.
i just don't see countries besides the us take any concern as to what's happening.
does anyone really care?
czar,
I mean, even when our national welfare is at stake, the "anti-war" movement is loud and fashionable.
if you still think iraq was a threat then you expose yourself as a zelous nutcase who has replaced the JW nonsense with right wing ideology and the 1974 prophesy with hussein's WMDs.
the fact that the US gives a flying shit about Sudan shows - once again - how little human rights, freedom, democracy and the other empty phrases spouted out by you and your neo-con gods really count.
dubla,
i agree. to idealize a politician is usually a big mistake.
kerry is without doubt more intelligent than bush and might actually have been an idealist when he was young....but by now he is probably just as corrupted as W (no honest man would or could ever get as far as he did).
concerning the iraq war...no one dared to speak out against the war. in march 2003 it would have been a political suicide to do so.
there was one senator (old guy, forgot his name) who dared to voice his opposition. he gave a fantastic speech...but the guy is overdue for retirement...so he had nothing to loose. for kerry and the other democrats a lot more was at stake. besides...i am sure they too get enough sponsoring from the oil and weapons indusry to look the other way in such cases.
or do you think they both knew he wasnt a threat, and they both lied?
B I N G O !
thichi,
One example is right after WWII, we had the bomb and could of literally ruled the world. However, Germany, Japan and other Nations today are a testament to the US?s benevolence,
nonsense! you needed germany as stronghold against communism in europe! and japan in the far east.
benevolence? laughable!
roy,
there is a difference between a civil war such as in ruanda and an aggressive attack on a sovereign country!
also, there would have been much better ways to help the iraqi people than to first bomb them and starve them to death just so they can get LIBERATED afterwards.
