Posts by Osarsif

if someone can be bothered to type in it or scan it and post (standard forum picture hosting tags is it on here [ img ] [ /img ] but without the spaces?

Osarsif

Source: http://watchtower.org.pl/forum/index.php?showtopic=684

16

Scan of old publications

by IT Support in

i'm preparing some information for my wife and kids, and would appreciate if someone was able to post a scan of these pages:

watchtower, august 1, 1926, p. 232

rutherford 'beating his slaves' just because they believed his crap:

IT Support,

The quote: "Some anticipated that the work would end in 1925, but the Lord did not so state." (take notice it's not "state so", it's "so state") is from The Watch Tower, August 1, 1926, p. 232, §48. You can find a scan of it in this page of Shaun's site.

The quote: "The difficulty was that the friends inflated their imaginations beyond reason; and that when their imaginations burst asunder, they were inclined to throw away everything." is not from The Watch Tower, August 1, 1926, p. 232. It's from The Watch Tower, February 15, 1925, p. 57, §51. You can find a scan of it at this link.

1

where can i find scans of golden age mags.

by golden age in

.

hello, .

i am in search of scans from the following golden age mags, does anyone know where they could be found.

Osarsif

http://www.infotdgeova.it/vaccinazioni.htm#_ftnref14
http://www.reino.org/VACUNAS_ORIG.htm

47

1995 "generation change", what were your early thoughts and what was said ?

by run dont walk in

i had been long gone by 1995, had i still been in , this would of definitely sent me packing, when the magazines came out in i believe nov 1995, what was your first or early reactions.

what was said from the platform and by the watchtower about this ?.

could someone please post the articles ??????

Osarsif

Thirdson wrote:

I couldn't believe what we were studying. On top of that someone answered and said that Newsweek had reported the change. Well that blew me away.

Newsweek article: http://www.caic.org.au/jws/predictions/newswk1.htm

28

Mother Teresa Comments WT 09-15-2002

by jgnat in

i have been waiting to see what the wts has to say about this little nun.

here it is in can saints help you?

wt september 15, 2002, introductory article, the modern appeal of saints .

Osarsif

jgnat wrote:

Hmmm. Never read the dark side. Wanna provide some links?

Mother Teresa's Crimes Against Humanity
http://www.lipmagazine.org/articles/featpostel_56.htm
http://www.lipmagazine.org/articles/featpostel_56_p2.htm

Mother Teresa, a Fanatic, a Fundamentalist, and a Fraud
http://slate.msn.com/id/2090083/

Christopher Hitchens on Mother Theresa (Interview)
http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/hitchens_16_4.html

How She Harmed Her Helpers As Well As Those They 'Helped'
http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/shields_18_1.html

India has no reason to be grateful to Mother Teresa
http://www.rationalistinternational.net/article/20031020_en.htm

Controversies concerning Mother Teresa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa

Saint to the Rich
http://www.salon.com/sept97/news/news3970905.html

Why Mother Teresa Should Not Be A Saintmirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12495017&method=full

16

THE BIBLE,God's Word or Man's?

by Blueblades in

jw
friends

printed in 1989,who remembers studying this publication at the book study and what have you concluded then and now?.

some chapter titles:how believable is the "old testament"?

the "new testament"----history or myth?.

Osarsif

http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm1.htm
http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm2.htm
http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm3.htm
http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm4.htm
http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm5.htm
http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm8.htm
http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/gm9.htm

54

The Holy Bible proves its inspired accuracy again...

by Derrick in

jw
friends

again and again the holy bible has proven its inspired historic accuracy.

check this out:

http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/package.jsp?name=fte/biblicaltunnel/biblicaltunnel

Osarsif

The news item Derrick posted says the tunnel "was built in 700 B.C. by order of King Hezekiah". Jehovah's Witnesses' book Insight on the Scriptures (1988), vol. 1, page 1102 says Hezekiah was "King of Judah, 745-717 B.C.E.". The news item contradicts Jehovah's Witnesses' chronology.

The news item Derrick posted says:

"By using radiocarbon testing to analyze the age of stalactite samples from the ceiling of the Siloam Tunnel and plant material recovered from its plaster floor, the biblical record and the tunnel's age have been confirmed, the researchers wrote in the journal Nature. The Siloam Tunnel is the one built by King Hezekiah."

An article from the Discovery Channel on the same tunnel says "Hezekiah (727-698 B.C.)" and:

"Radiocarbon-dating at a laboratory at Oxford University put the age of the wood sample at between 822-796 B.C., and that of two plant samples at 790-760 B.C. and 690-540 B.C. respectively."

None of these datings fall inside the period of Hezekiah's rule (727-698 B.C.). How can they claim that "the biblical record and the tunnel's age have been confirmed"?