I went to public school as many other of my peers. But I've seen a portion to JWs who were homeschooled. They did not seem properly educated.
Londo111
JoinedPosts by Londo111
-
40
The popularity fad of home-schooling!
by stuckinarut2 ini know this has been discussed over the years on this forum, but i just had to post this again!.
it seems that the popular fad amongst the "spiritual" ones in the local circuits is to home school their children instead of sending them to school.. now to clarify, we are in a very nice area of semi rural australia .
one with very community minded, and strong family values.
-
-
82
the-question (607 BCE explained and proved)
by pleaseresearch inso a user named "the-question" said the jw's were right about 607 bce.. this is your chance brother to prove us all wrong.. we all can't wait to hear from you :).
-
Londo111
That's what I used to believe. I was wrong.
And here is why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-K8pyVfKcU&t=1s&index=1&list=PLyNx0oM_bmgDJHQFzgm4L0rRuPpwTOVmz
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyNx0oM_bmgDJHQFzgm4L0rRuPpwTOVmz
-
82
the-question (607 BCE explained and proved)
by pleaseresearch inso a user named "the-question" said the jw's were right about 607 bce.. this is your chance brother to prove us all wrong.. we all can't wait to hear from you :).
-
Londo111
And he wasn't interested in discussing the matter either.
-
21
Why do trolls do what they do?
by Londo111 ini truly don't understand the mindset of a troll.
i know it's been explained, but i still don't get it.
it is hard to distinguish between a troll and a jw apologist at times because the reactions are very similar.
-
Londo111
I'm wondering who is hitting dislike? Did I step on someone's toes?
-
21
Why do trolls do what they do?
by Londo111 ini truly don't understand the mindset of a troll.
i know it's been explained, but i still don't get it.
it is hard to distinguish between a troll and a jw apologist at times because the reactions are very similar.
-
Londo111
I truly don't understand the mindset of a troll. I know it's been explained, but I still don't get it.
It is hard to distinguish between a troll and a JW apologist at times because the reactions are very similar. How can one tell the difference?
-
74
This site should be called Anti-Jehovahs-Witnesses Cry-babies
by the-Question inso, you left because of a bad example(s).. why all the whining?
nothing better to do with your time?.
you at least know far more about the bible than any church-goer?.
-
Londo111
World conditions since 1914 have only gotten better as a whole...which is a whole another video series: www.jwlove.org/1914ad
But in regard 607 BC, I'll take the first point about the Bible interpretation. There is nowhere in the Bible that proves the Jews returned from exile in 537 BC. If one reads Ezra chapters 1 to 3, it seems to point to 538 BC.
-
74
This site should be called Anti-Jehovahs-Witnesses Cry-babies
by the-Question inso, you left because of a bad example(s).. why all the whining?
nothing better to do with your time?.
you at least know far more about the bible than any church-goer?.
-
Londo111
BTW...if you want to talk about 607 BC, start another topic on the matter. Argue the case.
-
74
This site should be called Anti-Jehovahs-Witnesses Cry-babies
by the-Question inso, you left because of a bad example(s).. why all the whining?
nothing better to do with your time?.
you at least know far more about the bible than any church-goer?.
-
Londo111
There's lots of this information in written form out there about 607 BC. All it takes is a little googling.
https://ad1914.com/history-of-the-doctrine/
https://jeffro77.wordpress.com/index/607-for-dummies/
http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/607-587.php
And this is a synopsis of each of the videos I linked to above: www.jwlove.org/607bc
We've had plenty of debates with JW apologists on this forum about this very subject.
-
74
This site should be called Anti-Jehovahs-Witnesses Cry-babies
by the-Question inso, you left because of a bad example(s).. why all the whining?
nothing better to do with your time?.
you at least know far more about the bible than any church-goer?.
-
Londo111
As a JW, I would've said the same thing. Historians are not doing guesswork. And the Bible itself points to 587 BC.
That is why I did this video series on the subject exploring this from every angle.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyNx0oM_bmgDJHQFzgm4L0rRuPpwTOVmz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-K8pyVfKcU&index=1&list=PLyNx0oM_bmgDJHQFzgm4L0rRuPpwTOVmz
-
74
This site should be called Anti-Jehovahs-Witnesses Cry-babies
by the-Question inso, you left because of a bad example(s).. why all the whining?
nothing better to do with your time?.
you at least know far more about the bible than any church-goer?.
-
Londo111
I didn't leave because of "bad examples".
I left because I researched 607 BC and found not only was it wrong, the Watchtower articles defending 607 BC was deceptive.
Editing to add: Then I researched other topics (1914, the Faithful Slave, House to House preaching, the Great Crowd, ect) and found them equally erroneous.