Divine truth is static. Belief is dynamic.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are religions with a personal god, a creator. The same personal god and creator. However, it seems every so many centuries the goal posts get moved. Once you had hundreds of laws to follow and animals sacrifices to make to atone for breaking those laws. Then you had to accept one man who is either God incarnate as a human or the heavenly son of that God as your savior and follow his teachings. Finally, you had to follow the teachings of the final prophet of that same god and all that matters is you pray when your supposed to. So, three formulas for salvation (happy eternal existence) that are all different and conflicting, but one god. So, do those who lived and died faithfully under one set of "truths" still get their reward when the rules changed?
As far as the "right to judge" one must look at the definition of the word "right" under this context -
Right, noun: a moral or legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way. A power or privilege that is recognized by law or tradition.
No one if given a right. Laws can only recognize a right. As such, can one give oneself a right?
Is it moral to create a conscious living organism to give it a choice to either be a slave and worship you or be destroyed or worse, be eternally tortured?