Wow! This thread got 8 pages deep before I found it. Time to join the fray...
This court case needs to be boiled down to the simplest of terms -
In a free society, should a private citizen who owns a private business be compelled by the government to provide goods or service to to another private citizen?
Answer - No. Never.
Living in a free society can be a two-edged sword. There is a difference between right or wrong and legal or illegal. Some things many deem wrong are not illegal.
Racism and bigotry are real. Bigotry towards gender, sexuality, religion, etc. are all alive and practiced daily in societies free or otherwise. However, in a free society, morality should never be compelled by the government. Unfortunately groups on both sides of the spectrum are demanding the government impose their version of morality on the populace.
In the United States, only the government must provide its services to all persons regardless of who they are.
The only thing that upsets me about this story is that 2 out of the 9 Supreme Court Justices voted to compel the citizens of this nation to use their time and resources to do something they do not wish to do.