I always had an issue with the Bllod fractions being allowed, not that they should not be allowed, but that the WTBTS could somehow have in any way
get anything remotely having to do with fractions out of that scripture. It was clearly a "pacifier" or "salve" to many but not to me as I could see the maneuvering to try to "be all things for all people" and to slowly make a move toward allowing blood. I think it was a legal move for liability reasons.
The big kick in the teeth was hearing about the 2010 generation change. Especially the word "Evidently" being used in the explanation. I mean how can you use the word "evidently" in that explanation? See explanation "2" below, "on the basis of available evidence" Dude, if that is what the WTBTS thinks evidence is, then I AM OUT of here!!
NJY
Full Definition of EVIDENTLY
1
: in an evident manner : clearly, obviously <any style … so evidently bad or second-rate — T. S. Eliot>
2
: on the basis of available evidence <he was born…evidentlyin Texas — Robert Coughlan>