Would Harris make a distinction between "killing" and "dying"?
MeanMrMustard
JoinedPosts by MeanMrMustard
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
By my quoting the writing of Sam Harris, what I was trying to point out is that, maybe, just maybe a miscarriage is nature's way of ending...terminating...aborting...a pregnancy? Could be, could be.
I honesty don't understand this argument. Given the above, can you put a conclusion on it? Therefore........ what?
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Holly shit , it’s like my disfellowshipping hearing in here.
Leaving the WT doesn't imply leaving all standards behind.
“ better lifestyle choices, consequences , held accountable “. People ( besides you dorks ) get laid. It happens. Get over it. It’s none of your damn business.
But to your broader point: Go get laid. Go fork a bunch of girls, or get forked. I really don't care. But the debate around abortion is not about control. Perhaps you would like to think its about control. It really isn't. I don't care if you go pork three women, two men, five goats, and a horse all at the same time. I may care about the animals - they didn't consent. But as a way of illustrating my point, I don't forking care.
Go get drunk and laid all you want. Your body, your choice. But your liberty to swing your fist ends just where my nose begins, and once there is someone else's body in the mix, it's not strictly your choice anymore. -
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
A fair amount of the insight we may mistakingly atteibute to intelligence, is probably actually due to seeing real life consequences for actions.
That's why I was so amused by the #SexStrike movement. Basically, "Oh yeah?! Well if you aren't going to give me an easy way out, I'll just have to behave sensibly! I'm deleting all my hookup apps right now! How do like that, men?!"
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Some drunken mistakes have consequences. Like if you get drunk, drive, and kill someone. I guess the idea that such people should be held accountable is unacceptable? I mean it's just a drunken mistake. It shouldn't ruin their life, right?
Some "mistakes" are big mistakes. We would rather not have people make those horrible mistakes. So, society has constructed norms, over time, to minimize people making these mistakes - like don't get drunk and drive because the penalties are very high. Also, don't get drunk and fuck around - same reason.
But if you do get drunk, get a designated driver, or take an uber/ taxi, then that's a workable solution too. Likewise, if you insist on fucking around, get birth control or the morning after pill (also a workable solution).
-
31
I made a Website to examine the scriptures/words usage in every JW publication since 1950/1970
by ComingOutaMyCage inhi everyone!i'm new here, but have been active on the reddit r\exjw community.
i have just published a website where i analysed the last 50-70 years worth of watchtowers, awake, books, brochures, and kingdom ministries/work books.. i have collected all the data and published it at the link below.
you can also see below an example of genesis.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
I am in favor of all WT IT projects! Very good job. This is close to the ngram project I wanted to do.
Very nice, great success!
One thing that worries me is if you really have the full WT source material on the public repo, the WT may be able to take the entire thing down.
-
540
Simple Question Re 1914
by Slidin Fast inwt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
-
-
MeanMrMustard
The superiority of WT Chronology lies in its simplicity, easily understood by any reasonable person
https://c.tenor.com/PG7TQGmTPoMAAAAd/are-you-serious-spiderman.gif
-
173
Roe vs Wade Overturned by US Supreme Court!
by Simon ini know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
@titch:
In your view (or Sam Harris), there is no difference between a miscarriage and an abortion?
Is there a difference between dying of old age and someone chopping off another's head?
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
And refineries. To build a new oil refinery, it takes, what? 5 years? 10?
Why would anyone invest the money into a refinery when the government has made it abundantly clear it doesn't want you around?
Central planning hubris.
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
It's political theatre. It is an attempt to paint J6 as an insurrection, with Trump leading it. It clearly was not. And its getting close to the "fine people" level of BS. Look at what happened yesterday, a 'star witness' came forward to testify that Trump tried to commandeer the motorcade and lead it to the capital building (I assume as evidence he wanted to go lead an insurrection?). It was second-hand hearsay. We got a clear reason why that sort of crap isn't allowed in court. Why? Because within hours, the people who supposedly were the source of the story came out and said it was all bollocks and that they were willing to testify to that effect. Are they going to testify? No. Are we going to get people repeating the testimony they heard? Of course. I'm sure its just a matter of time before someone will say, "He tried to lead the mob - remember the testimony that he tried to commandeer his motorcade?!!!"
Give me a break.
You want to get to the bottom of J6? I mean REALLY want to? Honestly?
1) Release all the video.
2) Find the people who broke the windows and started the move inward
3) Find out why security was so lax.
4) Look into the Q character. Either confirm or deny the heavy probability that it was a fed.
