hi everyone!i'm new here, but have been active on the reddit r\exjw community.
i have just published a website where i analysed the last 50-70 years worth of watchtowers, awake, books, brochures, and kingdom ministries/work books.. i have collected all the data and published it at the link below.
you can also see below an example of genesis.
I am in favor of all WT IT projects! Very good job. This is close to the ngram project I wanted to do.
Very nice, great success!
One thing that worries me is if you really have the full WT source material on the public repo, the WT may be able to take the entire thing down.
wt claims that satan was thrown out of heaven in october 1914 precipitating ww!
and the end times.
a small problem with that is ww1 started on july 28th 1914 whilst satan was still in heaven picking his nose.. how did we not see this and waste years of precious life?
The superiority of WT Chronology lies in its simplicity, easily understood by any reasonable personhttps://c.tenor.com/PG7TQGmTPoMAAAAd/are-you-serious-spiderman.gif
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
@titch:
In your view (or Sam Harris), there is no difference between a miscarriage and an abortion?
Is there a difference between dying of old age and someone chopping off another's head?
And refineries. To build a new oil refinery, it takes, what? 5 years? 10?
Why would anyone invest the money into a refinery when the government has made it abundantly clear it doesn't want you around?
Central planning hubris.
It's political theatre. It is an attempt to paint J6 as an insurrection, with Trump leading it. It clearly was not. And its getting close to the "fine people" level of BS. Look at what happened yesterday, a 'star witness' came forward to testify that Trump tried to commandeer the motorcade and lead it to the capital building (I assume as evidence he wanted to go lead an insurrection?). It was second-hand hearsay. We got a clear reason why that sort of crap isn't allowed in court. Why? Because within hours, the people who supposedly were the source of the story came out and said it was all bollocks and that they were willing to testify to that effect. Are they going to testify? No. Are we going to get people repeating the testimony they heard? Of course. I'm sure its just a matter of time before someone will say, "He tried to lead the mob - remember the testimony that he tried to commandeer his motorcade?!!!"
Give me a break.
You want to get to the bottom of J6? I mean REALLY want to? Honestly?
1) Release all the video.
2) Find the people who broke the windows and started the move inward
3) Find out why security was so lax.
4) Look into the Q character. Either confirm or deny the heavy probability that it was a fed.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
I couldn't help but laugh. It confirms that it's not really about the edge cases - you know, rape, incest, forced prostitution, medical reasons - this is about using abortion as contraceptive.
And to that - the response has always been : well, you could be responsible and not fuck around so much. Roe is overturned and just like that women start to think about consequences again. Hmmmmmmmmm.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Don't know if this is really gaining traction... but LOL!
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
From Twitter:
Notice the framing. They keep saying it's not about life, it's about control. And of course Stpehen King hyperbolically welcomes everyone to the Handmaid's tale. The disconnect is incredible.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Woe. I had no idea the meltdown on Twitter was so intense. Blue checkmarks are losing their minds - but it's all the same talking point...
They really don't get the legal issue or the moral one.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
I can't wait until the riots start. Ironically, but not surprisingly, since the issue fell back to the states, and since most blue states will keep it legal, and since most rioters live in blue states, the left will burn down their own towns and cities in protest.
The real special ones will then look around and marvel at the institutional racism keeping them poor.
