Happy Thanksgiving. I’m having friends over, and there will be far more than 10 people in my house, most of which do not live here. We had my kids’s friends sleep over last night too.
No masks. Living life.
MeanMrMustard
JoinedPosts by MeanMrMustard
-
9
Happy pandemic Thanksgiving to all!!
by Biahi inhope you all have a happy, healthy day.
🍷🍠🥦🇺🇸.
-
-
-
3
// Happy debugging, suckers
by MeanMrMustard ini know there are a few software developers here.
just for fun.... .
-
-
MeanMrMustard
@Stephanie:
It's in the pre-processor, so it is a bit more devious. That is, someone might write code that looks like this:
if(my_variable == true)
{
// some code here
}
The keyword
truewould still be in the original code. All editors would register it as a normal code. It's only when the compilation process starts, and the pre-processor kicks in right before the compiler get ahold of the code, that the basic text replacement from "true" to "(rand() > 10)" takes place. -
3
// Happy debugging, suckers
by MeanMrMustard ini know there are a few software developers here.
just for fun.... .
-
-
MeanMrMustard
I know there are a few software developers here. Just for fun...
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
@TD:
Thats because there was fraud, Trump even won California. .... just kidding.
It has always been about the mail-in ballots. The normal procedure of requesting a ballot first was eliminated in MI, PA, and GA. Ballots were sprinkled over the states, causing an impossible situation to tracking sent/received and auditing. But worst of all, and this is what most of the affidavits from Rudy seem to state, that signature checks were purposely dropped.
So, Barnes (video above) seems correct. After the 2000/FL/Gore incident, the idea of risk limiting audits, WITH signature checks, was an agreed upon way to approach situations like this. I don’t think it is unreasonable to get these checks.
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
If my wife were to divorce me and cause me “mental distress”, can I sue? I mean, she obviously “intentionally” filed for divorce.
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
@TD:
I think there will be evidence - the type that has already been shown. And it will push all the contested states to do a signature match check on the mail-ins.
The evidence of Dominion being a software company created by dictators to rig elections - well, I think Sydney will have to go it her own on that one. And, I hear, she intends to. Amazing. But if she has this evidence, by all means - I am open to listening. But I don't think it will play any part in this election.
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
@DOC:
She has been really great for Flynn. The judge in the case has been attempting to drag this out, become a party to the case, appoint his own prosecutor, and wait until the election was over. But Sydney has experience in that type of law.
Nevertheless, Flynn will get pardoned.
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
The claims made by Sydney were extraordinary. Like I said before, if she really thought that, she should have dumped more evidence to the public.
The issues around the mail-in ballots and the relaxing of the requirements around signature checks still is true. But Sydney created a bit of a show.
I agree with Min - there needs to be more public engagement. Trump should push for full audits of signatures. In some states, like GA, they have to certify first before a suit can be filed. But if the signatures come out in favor of Biden, then concede, pardon Snowden, Assange, #BreakTheirToys
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Mid December when EC meets. Then House would accept the vote soon afterwards.
He (Trump) doesn’t have a lot of time, that’s for sure.
-
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Not to mention, as I noted, earlier, Trump needs 3+ states to overturn their election results. 3+ states = 3+ SC cases.
Not really. If the validity of the elections is thrown into doubt to the extent that they can’t certify, and the electors can’t vote, then neither candidate gets to 270.
Then it goes to the House for a vote by state delegation. Probably not going to happen. But he doesn’t need the states to reverse.