Here we go again... weeeeeeee.
Around and round on the throw-principles-of-freedom-out-the-window-because-I-am-pissed-and-hurt carousel.
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/07/27/exclusive-jehovahs-witnesses-face-harsh-persecution-in-putins-russia/_________in my daily sweep of the web for interesting jw articles, the above link popped up.the report is probably propped up by a stream of watchtower propaganda publicity releases to the media.but what struck me was the comments below the article.. give it read and join in if you feel moved..
Here we go again... weeeeeeee.
Around and round on the throw-principles-of-freedom-out-the-window-because-I-am-pissed-and-hurt carousel.
what are your views on the golden ratio or fibonacci sequence?
i know jws and some other groups use this as proof of gods existence.
i'm still looking into the debate but was wondering what others thought.
The golden ratio is 1.618 to 1 or any two Fibonacci numbers next to each other.
I would just like to underscore that Fibonacci numbers has very little to do with it (see the video on page 1). Start with any two positive integers that you like, the series will NOT be the Fibonacci series, but the ratio of any two consecutive numbers in the series will converge on the 1.618...
Sample:
Lets start the series with two numbers: 12345 and 57890. Each new number is the sum of the previous two, and we'll calculate the ratio of each pair on the series:
n1=12345, n2=67890, and gr=5.49939246658566 n1=67890, n2=80235, and gr=1.18183826778612 n1=80235, n2=148125, and gr=1.84613946532062 n1=148125, n2=228360, and gr=1.54167088607595 n1=228360, n2=376485, and gr=1.64864687335786 n1=376485, n2=604845, and gr=1.60655803020041 n1=604845, n2=981330, and gr=1.62244872653324 n1=981330, n2=1586175, and gr=1.61635229739231 n1=1586175, n2=2567505, and gr=1.61867700600501 n1=2567505, n2=4153680, and gr=1.61778847558233 n1=4153680, n2=6721185, and gr=1.61812778066678 n1=6721185, n2=10874865, and gr=1.61799816550207 n1=10874865, n2=17596050, and gr=1.61804767231593 n1=17596050, n2=28470915, and gr=1.61802876213696 n1=28470915, n2=46066965, and gr=1.61803598514484 n1=46066965, n2=74537880, and gr=1.61803322619582 n1=74537880, n2=120604845, and gr=1.61803428001977 n1=120604845, n2=195142725, and gr=1.61803387749472 n1=195142725, n2=315747570, and gr=1.61803403124559 n1=315747570, n2=510890295, and gr=1.61803397251798 n1=510890295, n2=826637865, and gr=1.61803399494993 n1=826637865, n2=1337528160, and gr=1.61803398638169 n1=1337528160, n2=2164166025, and gr=1.61803398965447 n1=2164166025, n2=3501694185, and gr=1.61803398840438 n1=3501694185, n2=5665860210, and gr=1.61803398888187 n1=5665860210, n2=9167554395, and gr=1.61803398869948 n1=9167554395, n2=14833414605, and gr=1.61803398876915 n1=14833414605, n2=24000969000, and gr=1.61803398874254 n1=24000969000, n2=38834383605, and gr=1.6180339887527 n1=38834383605, n2=62835352605, and gr=1.61803398874882 n1=62835352605, n2=101669736210, and gr=1.6180339887503 n1=101669736210, n2=164505088815, and gr=1.61803398874974 n1=164505088815, n2=266174825025, and gr=1.61803398874995 n1=266174825025, n2=430679913840, and gr=1.61803398874987 n1=430679913840, n2=696854738865, and gr=1.6180339887499 n1=696854738865, n2=1127534652705, and gr=1.61803398874989 n1=1127534652705, n2=1824389391570, and gr=1.6180339887499 n1=1824389391570, n2=2951924044275, and gr=1.61803398874989 n1=2951924044275, n2=4776313435845, and gr=1.6180339887499 n1=4776313435845, n2=7728237480120, and gr=1.61803398874989 n1=7728237480120, n2=12504550915965, and gr=1.61803398874989 n1=12504550915965, n2=20232788396085, and gr=1.61803398874989
The numbers above (n1, n2) are NOT Fibonacci numbers. It's just a property of the series (the next number is the sum of the previous two).
Another poster mentioned that if you have a piece of paper in the 1 : 1.618 proportion and then fold it in half, you get the same proportion. Yep. If you look at the video on p1, the "golden ratio" is exactly this:
[1 + sqrt(5)] / 2
Now, imagine a piece of paper in this exact ratio. If you half the largest side, and then take the ratio again, taking the reciprocal of the fraction (because the previous shorter end is now the longer end), you end up with:
4/ [1 + sqrt(5)]
or 1.2360679774997896964091736687313To check this in practice, I modified the above test to take the "halfing ratio", and here is what you come out with:
n1=12345, n2=67890, and gr=5.49939246658566, half ratio: 0.363676535572249. n1=67890, n2=80235, and gr=1.18183826778612, half ratio: 1.69227893064124. n1=80235, n2=148125, and gr=1.84613946532062, half ratio: 1.0833417721519. n1=148125, n2=228360, and gr=1.54167088607595, half ratio: 1.29729374671571. n1=228360, n2=376485, and gr=1.64864687335786, half ratio: 1.21311606040081. n1=376485, n2=604845, and gr=1.60655803020041, half ratio: 1.24489745306649. n1=604845, n2=981330, and gr=1.62244872653324, half ratio: 1.23270459478463. n1=981330, n2=1586175, and gr=1.61635229739231, half ratio: 1.23735401201002. n1=1586175, n2=2567505, and gr=1.61867700600501, half ratio: 1.23557695116465. n1=2567505, n2=4153680, and gr=1.61778847558233, half ratio: 1.23625556133356. n1=4153680, n2=6721185, and gr=1.61812778066678, half ratio: 1.23599633100413. n1=6721185, n2=10874865, and gr=1.61799816550207, half ratio: 1.23609534463186. n1=10874865, n2=17596050, and gr=1.61804767231593, half ratio: 1.23605752427391. n1=17596050, n2=28470915, and gr=1.61802876213696, half ratio: 1.23607197028968. n1=28470915, n2=46066965, and gr=1.61803598514484, half ratio: 1.23606645239164. n1=46066965, n2=74537880, and gr=1.61803322619582, half ratio: 1.23606856003954. n1=74537880, n2=120604845, and gr=1.61803428001977, half ratio: 1.23606775498944. n1=120604845, n2=195142725, and gr=1.61803387749472, half ratio: 1.23606806249118. n1=195142725, n2=315747570, and gr=1.61803403124559, half ratio: 1.23606794503597. n1=315747570, n2=510890295, and gr=1.61803397251798, half ratio: 1.23606798989987. n1=510890295, n2=826637865, and gr=1.61803399494993, half ratio: 1.23606797276338. n1=826637865, n2=1337528160, and gr=1.61803398638169, half ratio: 1.23606797930894. n1=1337528160, n2=2164166025, and gr=1.61803398965447, half ratio: 1.23606797680876. n1=2164166025, n2=3501694185, and gr=1.61803398840438, half ratio: 1.23606797776374. n1=3501694185, n2=5665860210, and gr=1.61803398888187, half ratio: 1.23606797739897. n1=5665860210, n2=9167554395, and gr=1.61803398869948, half ratio: 1.2360679775383. n1=9167554395, n2=14833414605, and gr=1.61803398876915, half ratio: 1.23606797748508. n1=14833414605, n2=24000969000, and gr=1.61803398874254, half ratio: 1.23606797750541. n1=24000969000, n2=38834383605, and gr=1.6180339887527, half ratio: 1.23606797749764. n1=38834383605, n2=62835352605, and gr=1.61803398874882, half ratio: 1.23606797750061. n1=62835352605, n2=101669736210, and gr=1.6180339887503, half ratio: 1.23606797749948. n1=101669736210, n2=164505088815, and gr=1.61803398874974, half ratio: 1.23606797749991. n1=164505088815, n2=266174825025, and gr=1.61803398874995, half ratio: 1.23606797749974. n1=266174825025, n2=430679913840, and gr=1.61803398874987, half ratio: 1.23606797749981. n1=430679913840, n2=696854738865, and gr=1.6180339887499, half ratio: 1.23606797749978. n1=696854738865, n2=1127534652705, and gr=1.61803398874989, half ratio: 1.23606797749979. n1=1127534652705, n2=1824389391570, and gr=1.6180339887499, half ratio: 1.23606797749979. n1=1824389391570, n2=2951924044275, and gr=1.61803398874989, half ratio: 1.23606797749979. n1=2951924044275, n2=4776313435845, and gr=1.6180339887499, half ratio: 1.23606797749979. n1=4776313435845, n2=7728237480120, and gr=1.61803398874989, half ratio: 1.23606797749979. n1=7728237480120, n2=12504550915965, and gr=1.61803398874989, half ratio: 1.23606797749979. n1=12504550915965, n2=20232788396085, and gr=1.61803398874989, half ratio: 1.23606797749979.In summary, if a piece of paper is in the golden ratio, and you half it, then it is no longer in the golden ratio. Sorry.
I still don't see what the big deal is with this ratio. You are just noticing a pattern in mathematics. That is like saying: "I think it is amazing that a flower grew in a field of flowers."
at a time when women fly combat aircraft, when they are grant equality in education,in employment,in government,in athletics,etc.
what entitles women to the status of children still?.
women and children first when it comes to emergency situations.
It is a biological strategy. If the eggs die, the tribe ceases to exist. Men are expendable in emergencies.
what are your views on the golden ratio or fibonacci sequence?
i know jws and some other groups use this as proof of gods existence.
i'm still looking into the debate but was wondering what others thought.
Meh. It's just a pattern. Follow the math here. It is generalized to *any* series where the next number is the sum of the previous two:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTWKKvlZB08
What this means is: pick any two positive integers, any. Use those numbers to start the series. Calculate the ratio of n / n-1, and it will converge to the golden ratio each time.
In other words, there's nothing special about Fibonacci numbers - it is just the pattern it makes as you calculate the ratio of the the nth number and the one before it. There are other series as well, sum of squares, etc. They all make patterns.
The mistake is thinking the patterns imply God.
i was subjected to more than one of these whilst married.
a partner should be treated as an equal.
i wonder how that will work out in a jw household?.
The woman in this video would leave to jail for up to five years. Lol.
i was subjected to more than one of these whilst married.
a partner should be treated as an equal.
i wonder how that will work out in a jw household?.
LMAO. I need some popcorn. All of these laws, no doubt, were written with men in mind. Of course, because women are sugar and spice. But pretty much all of these things I would say women do much more than men. It’s going to be turned around on women at some point, and that will be hilarious.
Its basically illegal to cheat. Good lord. Good lord.
it seems that many believe that a liberal in the usa must be a democrat, pretty much following the party core teachings and some even think it means approving the party history of, during the 19th century, supporting or tolerated slavery and opposing civil rights reforms after the civil war.
some even insist that a liberal loves anything and everything obama did..
balderdash!!.
it seems that many believe that a liberal in the usa must be a democrat, pretty much following the party core teachings and some even think it means approving the party history of, during the 19th century, supporting or tolerated slavery and opposing civil rights reforms after the civil war.
some even insist that a liberal loves anything and everything obama did..
balderdash!!.
@Apostate Anonymous:
Right, but you understand my irritation?
Goes something like this:
“Trump is a nationalist, and you support him?”
“Yes, he is, and I voted for him.”
“You fascist, racist bastard!”
“Wait, what? Nationalism is bad?”
“Yeah... hello, Nazis!! You said it, Trump is a nationalist, just like all the racists are.”
*face palm*
it seems that many believe that a liberal in the usa must be a democrat, pretty much following the party core teachings and some even think it means approving the party history of, during the 19th century, supporting or tolerated slavery and opposing civil rights reforms after the civil war.
some even insist that a liberal loves anything and everything obama did..
balderdash!!.
Define “white nationalist”.
A nationalist is someone who wishes political independence for his/her country - being concerned with his/her country as a citizen, as opposed to other countries in which the person is NOT a citizen.
A white nationalist, hopefully, is not much different than a black nationalist; just different skin color.
But I have a sneaking suspicion it’s not like that, right? These are the word games.
it seems that many believe that a liberal in the usa must be a democrat, pretty much following the party core teachings and some even think it means approving the party history of, during the 19th century, supporting or tolerated slavery and opposing civil rights reforms after the civil war.
some even insist that a liberal loves anything and everything obama did..
balderdash!!.
@OTWO:
I know you said you didn’t want to discuss each topic, but you did mention generally:
I believe in socialist policies on schools and healthcare and an equalizing in both areas.
And this:
Mainly, I am a liberal because I believe that laws and budgets should put people first.
And this:
Socialism has not worked in the world because true socialism has not existed. In current socialisms, some people are more "equal" than others.
Socialism will never work, no matter how it is tried. Prices, profits, losses, entrepreneurship, and interest rates all perform very important functions. The extent to which those mechanisms are undermined is the extent to which you end up with the effects you decry.
I think your post is a good one - but consider that I do believe you when you say you want people put first. I believe that you want to help people. But also consider that if someone in the right disagrees with you, they don’t mean to imply they are against people raising their standard of living.
To put it more concisely: I believe the economic effects of policies you favor will, in fact, undermine the same effects you wish those policies to accomplish.
Socialism can’t calculate. And half socialist programs can calculate better, but not great: