I think Scully summed it up very well.
It's a bit dicey to label people as "trolls"... it's really no better than the WTS or individual JWs deciding that we are "apostates".
Obviously we are going to disagree on some fundamental issues with people who are JWs. But if they are willing to enter a dialogue with us - as evidenced by their posting here - then let's try to find some common ground and work from there.
I bet most honest-hearted JWs would be interested in protecting their children from child molesters posing as JWs in good standing.
I bet most honest-hearted JWs don't want to have elders who engage in spousal abuse to lead their congregation and present themselves as an example of what a "true Christian" is.
I bet most honest-hearted JWs are interested in the changes in the WTS's blood policy, and don't want their child or spouse to die needlessly.
Let's find something in common to discuss with them rather than beat them over the head with prejudicial labels
gringojj, I think you need to find a different topic.