i love the darkness.
i'm so glad that i can now enjoy this music, despite f words...whatever.
edited to get rid of embedded page
I'm a Queen fan as well and there is no comparison.
The Darkness are about the silliest band I've seen in a long time. They typify the British obsession with "the next big thing". They will be regarded by some critics as "post-ironic" but in the end will be laughed at as just being self-parodying. It's like Andrew WK a couple of years ago - he was hailed as being the saviour of rock and being very tongue in cheek with his testosto-rock, but in the end he simply silly.
he told my husband ?i don?t care, i just need to know is this the truth or not?
i just don?t understand why.
once again i was asked a question that i could not answer.
Glad you mentioned the same thing Minimus. Something in this letter did not ring true. It made it sound like the elder recently looked on the UNs site (which no longer has the WTS on it) and things like that. I doubt that many would be asking questions of the elders re: UN NGO association. I'll believe it when I see a real response from the Society.
joanne's amazing anagrams!
one of the things that helped joanne cope with being brought up in a religious cult, was her fantastic sense of humour and her love of reading.
joanne told me that she and a friend used to be so board during the meetings, they would play word games just to pass the time.
Those are absolutely brilliant.
(from german watchtower).
if you se just a red x, press refresh :).
izzy
Stupid question, but where the heck is Canada on the list? and what country is Frankreich? I thought he used to be the backup QB for the Buffalo Bills.
this is a web site that may interest many readers here.
not only is there a critical evaluation of the creation book, but dimaggio sent letters to the wt.
their response is of course pathetic.
I abhorred the attitude of the branch when they basically said, "the Society is not beyond contstructive criticism" but them lambasted and threatened DiMaggio for the "way" that he did it... thereby deflecting attention away from the issues he raised. Pure arrogance displaying none of the humility that they supposedly allude to.
do any of you other women play bunko?
i moved into a great neighborhood and they already have 12 players, so i can only go when they need a sub.
actually, that's ok with me because its not always easy to get away nor do i want to 'get away' from my daughter.
Personally I prefer Phase 10
.
well i have been busy tonight.
if your name is not on the map please post your name and the province you are in..
me -> Ontario
now normally i don't have the time or patience for the threads that suggest ideas for making mischief at jw meetings etc., but i thought about an idea that would be pretty funny.
alot of halls use wireless mikes these days.
it'd be pretty funny to get some inside information and find out what model and frequency a local kh was using and add some dialogue to an in-progress meeting from outside with your own mike... snicker when the speaker says something ridiculous, whisper "baloney" after a bald-face lie, impersonate jah and tell everyone you are very displeased and to cut the crap already...
Now normally I don't have the time or patience for the threads that suggest ideas for making mischief at JW meetings etc., but I thought about an idea that would be pretty funny. Alot of Halls use wireless mikes these days. It'd be pretty funny to get some inside information and find out what model and frequency a local KH was using and add some dialogue to an in-progress meeting from outside with your own mike... snicker when the speaker says something ridiculous, whisper "baloney" after a bald-face lie, impersonate Jah and tell everyone you are very displeased and to cut the crap already...
This is a battle I'd like to see!
scholar,.
back on october 7, you said:i will respond to your response to the historical blunder made by franz and jonsson as alleged by me in a couple of days.. .
(the post was http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/59355/901501/post.ashx#901501 the thread was wts chronology(oslo hypothesis) from vicar;trinity college fellow,cambridge.).
And please avoid statements like the following:
Alan F has an agenda which is aligned to that of a person who has rejected Christ and has become an unbeliever. How can anyone who professes Christianity choose to believe his utterances.
It could just as easily be said that:
Scholar has an agenda which is aligned to that of a person who blindly accepts the Watchtower Society as authority instead of Jesus. How can anyone who professes Christianity choose to believe his utterances.
Attacking the messenger instead of the message only implies that you haven't got good arguments and factually correct information to supply a retort.
I have tired of this thread regardless. To me, the response from Writing Committee from the call to the Society is sufficient to prove their mistake in thinking it means "equate" versus "connected".
