The woman in the middle will get half the inheritance that her brother gets, her husband will be allowed to take a second wife and possibly kill her to make it happen, she is not allowed to divorce or have custody of her children, her husband can beat her for even minor infractions of Sharia, providing the stick is no bigger than his thumb.
Oh for god's sake, until recently in the "Christian" world if a man died without a will his oldest son, or all his sons, depending on the region, inherited everything. The daughters were then taken care of by the sons, if the daughters were unmarried, and if they were lucky.
In the "Christian" world men take lovers, mistresses, or divorce their first wife and cast them out while marrying a second. In the opinion of some people, the Islamic way of retaining and looking after the first wife is more moral.
Murder, any murder, is treated as a crime in Islamic jurisdictions.
I know of no Islamic country where the wife may not divorce her husband.
Wife-beating is horrendously common in "Christian" countries.
While we are comparing Christianity and Islam, let's consider Queen Elizabeth II of England. She is married to her second cousin (and third cousin, two different genealogical relationships) and comes from a long line of Christian royalty where 100% male inheritance and wife-killing (Henry the 8th, anyone?) was an accepted Christian norm.
I appreciate your pseudo-feminism, Palmtree, but please choose the correct targets. 1.2 billion ordinary people, including 600 million or so women, trying to live moral and clean lives, should not invoke our anger. Those individual men and individual legal systems, those that abuse or disregard or disempower women, should.
It's not about Islam at all. It's about people. It's about culture. If you attack an entire religion and all its adherents you completely miss that point.