Clock Click the pencil on your post. Hurry, you must do it within 30 minutes.
Like I just did!
to paraphrase martin niemoller is this how it is in the congregations?.
first they came for the adulterers ,?and i didn't speak out because i wasn't an adulterer.. then they came for the smokers, ?and i didn't speak out because i wasn't a smoker.. then they came for gamblers, ?and i didn't speak out because i wasn't a gambler.. then they came for the brazen,?and i didn't speak out because i wasn't brazen.. then they came for the apostates, ?and i didn't speak out because i wasnt apostate.
then they came for me,?and there was no one left to speak for me.. or to put it another way: .
Clock Click the pencil on your post. Hurry, you must do it within 30 minutes.
Like I just did!
.
so says the ad.. i'm taking it personally!.
cc.
Really, only three? My Ex, her mom, her dad, her brothers, her sisters...they must not be counting carefully!
at 9 pm on abc.
previews in last two videos on this link:.
http://www.wetpaint.com/greys-anatomy/articles/greys-anatomy-season-9-episode-13-spoilers-7-things-we-learned-from-the-sneak-peeks-video.
"We are juggling all kinds of alternative measures, but nothing is as good as blood."
Hats off to the script writer!
i would like to have your opinions on what i should do about a situation please.. i have recently discovered that a 'brother' in the congregation (which i no longer attend) is a child molester.
i've seen documentation from his psychiatrist dated a few years ago, stating that he doesn't feel that this person is likely to offend again.
the 'brother' has said to the elders at some point that he has it under control but cannot be 100% sure it won't happen again.
Is he on a registered offender required to avoid contact with children? If so, report to the authorities that he is involved with a woman who has young children. They have the power to intervene.
this is obviously a question for parents.
i have made my decision, but i am interested in your views and feelings.
if you are a young person, i would be interested in your thoughts and feelings too.
I'm also with Tec on this issue. Unless there's something dangerous going on, leave it alone. If you need to read the diary to realize there is a problem, the problem is a bigger than anything they wrote.
the newish japanese government is conservative in bent, and its finance minister recently raised eyebrows with the above statement.
japan, as you may know, is a rapidly aging society as the long falling birthrate bites into the demographics.. here's how the english guardian reports this tale:.
let elderly people 'hurry up and die', says japanese ministertaro aso says he would refuse end-of-life care and would 'feel bad' knowing treatment was paid for by government.
Sounds like he'd make a great republican candidate here in the USA.
Sounds like a real-life democrat I remember. Richard Lamm said essentially the same thing. From Time Magazine:
Colorado's Governor causes a furor on the issue of dying
The words seemed calculated to provoke an uproar. Elderly people who are terminally ill "have a duty to die," declared Colorado Governor Richard Lamm, 48, at a meeting of the Colorado Health Lawyers Association last week in Denver. "Like leaves which fall off a tree forming the humus in which other plants can grow, we've got a duty to die and get out of the way with all of our machines and artificial hearts, so that our kids can build a reasonable life."
i am interested in the answers for a new poll.
also, feel free to suggest other options, wording etc.agreed in full with the watchtower guidelinesagreed with shunning in general, but not for familywas stumbled by this practice but shunned as instructeddid not agree with the practice and secretly associated with disfellowshipped people .
for me personally, i did not agree with the practice and secretly associated with disfellowshipped people, even whilst at bethel.
GL Tirebiter, as a non-believer, did you ever discuss with your ex that you found his behaviour peculiar?
No, it was difficult to discuss anything related to the WTBTS with her, essentially impossible. In her eyes any disagreement merely showed that I "hate the Witnesses."
Separating your regard for someone as a person from your opinion of their behavior was something she did not fathom. I think that has much to do with shunning: if a person fails in some way, they must be A Bad Person. Never mind that "all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23).
i am interested in the answers for a new poll.
also, feel free to suggest other options, wording etc.agreed in full with the watchtower guidelinesagreed with shunning in general, but not for familywas stumbled by this practice but shunned as instructeddid not agree with the practice and secretly associated with disfellowshipped people .
for me personally, i did not agree with the practice and secretly associated with disfellowshipped people, even whilst at bethel.
When I was the non-believing mate of a JW, I found it strange and peculiar. How could Ex suddenly dodge phone calls from the Sister who had been her best friend for years? (A: because the elders said this friend was a Bad Association.) After years of ignoring her, how could it suddenly be as if it was the good old days and the dark period never happened? (A: because the best friend got reinstated.)
It's petty. It's mean. It's about as un-Christian a practice as could be imagined. It's a nasty way to manipulate people, and a weird loyalty test (WTBTS has many of those).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blw0mnqh0r8 .
i laughed out loud!
guess you had to be there!
(deleted, it wasn't all that funny)
this is my personal review of the memorial talk for this year.
take into account that this is a new "outline".
i put "outline" in quotes because.
It feels to me like a rejection of Christ himself.
Yes, it is. Furthermore, it is a rejection of God's grace: freely offered, stubbornly refused.