Penton mentions on page 47 that Rutherford was attracted to Bryan's "populist ideals" and footnotes to page 348 that Rutherford actually campaigned for Bryan.
Apocalypse Delayed.
does anyone know where it mentioned that rutherford was involved in william jennings bryan's presidential campaign(s)?
also, i recall reading that rutherford said bryan was god's choice as president for the usa!
if that was so, then it is very strange that bryan was never elected president!.
Penton mentions on page 47 that Rutherford was attracted to Bryan's "populist ideals" and footnotes to page 348 that Rutherford actually campaigned for Bryan.
Apocalypse Delayed.
how were the doomsday dumplings?.
seriously, was the food good?
i used to hear it was awesome; somehow i don't believe that!
I forgot to mention the Thomas' English Muffins which were available for free...day(s) old stuff...but free.
On one family night skit they did a "101 Things to do with the Thomas' English Muffins" skit. Quite funny.
Door stops, mini-pizzas, etc...
a chapter in this book:
the cultural experience: ethnography in complex society
david w. mccurdy, james p. spradley, and dianna j. shandy
A chapter in this book:
The Cultural Experience: Ethnography in Complex Society David W. McCurdy, James P. Spradley, and Dianna J. Shandy ISBN 1-57766-364-0
contains an Ethnographic Study of Jehovah's Witnesses.
I have it in a PDF. It is 12 pages and 2.22MB.
PM me if you'd like it e-mailed.
how were the doomsday dumplings?.
seriously, was the food good?
i used to hear it was awesome; somehow i don't believe that!
I loved it.
As Blondie said, one could "glean" food they wanted to eat and if something was not too good you could eat the leftovers.
The cheesecake and other desserts were exceptional, IMHO.
For most of my stay our table was a joke... breakfast and lunch were assigned seating and supper was open seating.
i had begun to read schnell's book when we first left - but in the 'fresh out of the borg' mental state, i had found it too caustic.
now i am reading it and find it quite interesting due to the time frame - in judge rutherford's era.. one of the premises that he states repeatedly in the book, took me by surprise.
i would be curious if any could confirm/deny the reality of his accusations here.
A 2002 Dissertation, see abstract below, addresses the legal strategies of Covington.
The file is 7.51MB and 208 pages in PDF.
PM me if you'd like me to try to e-mail it to you.
.
does anyone have, or know where i can download, this booklet?
if not, i'll scan it and make it available in a pdf but ....didn't want to if i didn't have to.
I placed it into a PDF, size = 19.95MB
If anyone would like it e-mailed, and you think your ISP can handle a 19.95 MB e-mail, PM and I'll send it.
Another option would be to quarter it.
Thanks Nathan.
.
does anyone have, or know where i can download, this booklet?
if not, i'll scan it and make it available in a pdf but ....didn't want to if i didn't have to.
Thank you, Nathan, for posting it at reexamine.
.
does anyone have, or know where i can download, this booklet?
if not, i'll scan it and make it available in a pdf but ....didn't want to if i didn't have to.
Could you upload the file to savefile.com or another free hosting site? They take files up to 60MB.
That would be great but if that's not possible, I'll try to scan it within a week or two.
.
does anyone have, or know where i can download, this booklet?
if not, i'll scan it and make it available in a pdf but ....didn't want to if i didn't have to.
Does anyone have, or know where I can download, this booklet?
If not, I'll scan it and make it available in a PDF but ....didn't want to if I didn't have to.
Please and thank you.
the "bible teach" book, on p.89 says:millions of people have been killed in wars during the past century.
one british historian wrote: "the 20th century was the most murderous in recorded history...it was a century of almost unbroken war, with few and brief periods without organised and armed conflict somewhere.
" a report from the worldwatch institute states: "three times as many people fell victim to war in [the 20th] century as in all the wars from the first century ad to 1899.
To compare on quantity of deaths alone is not a complete analysis.
A more equitable comparison would be to calculate the deaths as a percentage of total humans on the earth at the time of the conflict …to get the “bloodiest.”
There are other ways to slice it as well…. But a strict “quantity” analysis is weak, IMHO.