They are certainly very similar:
http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/similar-religions/christadelphians.php
You sure you're not just wasting their time though? Have you really researched the Bible objectively?
in my plan to exit the jw i thought it would be good if i adhere to another faith group, not cultish as the jw but non trinitarian.. this is decided for the sake of my children (two sons)'s spritual safety.
i researched the internet and in the non trinitarian groups i found these christadelphian.
any idea about this group?.
They are certainly very similar:
http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/similar-religions/christadelphians.php
You sure you're not just wasting their time though? Have you really researched the Bible objectively?
since leaving the jw religion,what can you say that you have learned about life/people in a positive way that you probably would have never experienced.
if you had remained a witness ?.
my story is regarding this :.
Like others on this thread it was (and still is) to stop looking down on others (worldly) people.
That appalling smug superiority that JW's possess is sometimes still there in me. That I'm better as I know something they don't. So I pull myself out of that and start to do nice things for other people like offer my seat on public transport and it's very humbling. Things that for some reason I rarely did as a JW.
JW's really are self made social outcasts due thie attitude they posses and I'm currently fighting.
i would like to meet so many people!
actually hang out with them and see if we get along after meeting in person!.
here's my list:.
Besty said:
we met up with wizzstick and his lovely wife and family a few weeks back - its always nice to meet new people
We did indeed, and it was fab! Lovely time and great company.
Aside from Besty and Sweet Pea I've met a few Ex-JW's once before at the UK premier of Truth Be Told. Great to chat and swap stories of life inside.
Looking forward to meeting more soon.
in the field service, during my preaching to a householder, she interrupted me and said: i would ask something, after getting answer you can continue!
i said ok. she said: i was not believing in the existence of a god until recently.
last month, in the middle of the night, i got an emergency call from my hospital to attend to a complicated caesarean case.
Well the real answer was provided by the gang.
I asked them why they remained around my car, as though guarding me and my vehicle. They said they are actually criminals. But they knew that the place is very dangerous for a woman to be alone in a car. Hence they thought of guarding me. When they saw the hospital vehicle arriving, they left.
They were human beings looking after another human being. A simple act of kindness. Nothing divine happened. Which explained why others have been attacked in a similar situation. They did not find themsleves with humans who looked after other humans.
Strange she should read so much into it. But then people 'want' to believe.
i got this from this link.
http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/jwblooddoctrineorigin10.htm here is the information.
after reading it all, it really made how the doctrine developed look very ridiculous.
Thanks - marking for future ref.
so the new jan wt article on "100 years of kingdom rulehow does it affect you?
" is up, which i think has its own thread.
but over on jwr poster cg4205 has noticed something that demands a seperate thread i think.. at the top of the article, in the can you answer box, it says:.
Thanks all, and thanks for the quote AnnOMaly. 2+2=5 - that is very funny.
Still seems an odd way of expressing it as the text only mentions Jesus.
so the new jan wt article on "100 years of kingdom rulehow does it affect you?
" is up, which i think has its own thread.
but over on jwr poster cg4205 has noticed something that demands a seperate thread i think.. at the top of the article, in the can you answer box, it says:.
I seem to remember that too - but that point is not discussed in the article. It's Jesus that is referred to as king.
So a (really) embarressing typo I guess.
so the new jan wt article on "100 years of kingdom rulehow does it affect you?
" is up, which i think has its own thread.
but over on jwr poster cg4205 has noticed something that demands a seperate thread i think.. at the top of the article, in the can you answer box, it says:.
So the new Jan WT article on "100 Years of Kingdom Rule—How Does It Affect You?" is up, which I think has its own thread. But over on JWR poster cg4205 has noticed something that demands a seperate thread I think.
At the top of the article, in the Can You Answer box, it says:
How did Jehovah become King in 1914, and what were some of the Kingdom’s early accomplishments? (Bold mine)
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/w20140115/100-years-kingdom-rule/
What? Surely this is Jesus?
It looks like it is a typo rather than new light as paragraph 3 makes the clear point that it's Jesus. But come on, the typo checking team cocked up with the Numbers numbering in the Silver Sword and now this.
Where is the Holy Spirit these days?!
so i've been sharing some a little at a time with my sister.
she is married and very scared of actually learning too much.
she doesn't want to ruin her marriage.
Thanks Jeffro.
Your help on these queries is always appreciated.
so i've been sharing some a little at a time with my sister.
she is married and very scared of actually learning too much.
she doesn't want to ruin her marriage.
Am I right in thinking that JW's get the 2,520 years in two ways?
A) As above, 7 (years) x 360 (days) equals 2,520 (then day for a year)
B) 3.5 times of 1,260 days doubled to 7 times of 2,520 days (then day for a year)
Or is one way the old way of working it out and the other the new way?