I said I was sure I read it in a Watchtower that he was a normal man only without sin and he could have got married if he wanted to. And that almost all men got married in that culture so it would be unusual if Jesus didn't get married. This did not go down well, to say the least. So I backtracked.
At some point it dawned on me that I had read Bart Ehrman make this argument, not the Watchrower. It's come to something when I mix up Ehrman and the Watchtower!
In the end I said I must have mixed up Jesus with Paul. It's Paul that might have been married, probably not but we can't be sure.
The JW was not impressed at my explanation that I mixed up Jesus with Paul, I'm definitely bad association again. Ah well.