LoveUniHateExams

Joined

• started 328 topics
• posted 8,797 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by LoveUniHateExams

• 
  24

  The Animal Sentience Bill - what next?

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. social
  2. current

  so, in the uk there was recently a bill which was nodded through parliament - the animal sentience bill - which was backed by vegan activists.. dogs, cats.

  cows, even lobsters now have been recognised to have feelings.. first of all, let me say that if you want to go vegan that's fine with me.

  we're all allowed our individual dietary choices.. but for how much longer?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  If we take their life we must do so humanely - yes, I agree with you.

  But the Vegans don't, that was kinda my point.
  
  
• 
  24

  The Animal Sentience Bill - what next?

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. social
  2. current

  so, in the uk there was recently a bill which was nodded through parliament - the animal sentience bill - which was backed by vegan activists.. dogs, cats.

  cows, even lobsters now have been recognised to have feelings.. first of all, let me say that if you want to go vegan that's fine with me.

  we're all allowed our individual dietary choices.. but for how much longer?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  All words. I don't believe they are serious about anything unless and until they go after Halal meat production - yes, you have a point.

  I was talking with a Vegan on a Vegan post on FaceBook. I asked him if Inuit people should stop eating meat and wearing polar bear fur. He couldn't answer.

  So, just to twist the knife, I suggested an idea: Inuit people should jettison their culture, stop eating meat and wearing animal fur, convert to Veganism, migrate en masse to Vancouver, Toronto, etc., and live like white people, lol.

  The point is that the Vegan activist lobby is basically a bunch of white, middle class people who try to shame other white people. The minute you raise other people and cultures, they clam up tighter than a duck's arsehole, lol.
  
  
  
• 
  24

  The Animal Sentience Bill - what next?

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. social
  2. current

  so, in the uk there was recently a bill which was nodded through parliament - the animal sentience bill - which was backed by vegan activists.. dogs, cats.

  cows, even lobsters now have been recognised to have feelings.. first of all, let me say that if you want to go vegan that's fine with me.

  we're all allowed our individual dietary choices.. but for how much longer?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  I think people who campaign for animal rights deserve our support - but their aim isn't to improve livestock conditions, it's to stop meat being produced.

  BTW, I'm all for improving livestock conditions ... if that's the only aim.
  
  
• 
  24

  The Animal Sentience Bill - what next?

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. social
  2. current

  so, in the uk there was recently a bill which was nodded through parliament - the animal sentience bill - which was backed by vegan activists.. dogs, cats.

  cows, even lobsters now have been recognised to have feelings.. first of all, let me say that if you want to go vegan that's fine with me.

  we're all allowed our individual dietary choices.. but for how much longer?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  So, in the UK there was recently a Bill which was nodded through Parliament - the Animal Sentience Bill - which was backed by Vegan activists.

  Dogs, cats. cows, even lobsters now have been recognised to have feelings.

  First of all, let me say that if you want to go Vegan that's fine with me. We're all allowed our individual dietary choices.

  But for how much longer? It doesn't take a genius to see where this is heading: Vegans are going to use this Bill to improve livestock welfare. On the surface of it, that sounds good. But whenever Vegans are asked what conditions would be better, they always answer the same thing: none. So, Vegans are going to use this Bill and any resultant legislation to try and close down meat-producing farms.

  Yes, Vegans - an unelected minority - will try to force everyone else to conform. And this sounds an awful lot like a new kind of aristocracy.
• 
  146

  Science News article: ‘Case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans

  by Disillusioned JW in

  1. social
  2. current

  a news article has the headline of " ‘case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans"; see https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans .

  the article says in part the following.. 'the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate has passed 99.9%, according to research that strengthens the case for global action at the cop26 summit in glasgow.. the degree of scientific certainty about the impact of greenhouse gases is now similar to the level of agreement on evolution and plate tectonics, the authors say, based on a survey of nearly 90,000 climate-related studies.

  this means there is practically no doubt among experts that burning fossil fuels, such as oil, gas, coal, peat and trees, is heating the planet and causing more extreme weather.. a previous survey in 2013 showed 97% of studies published between 1991 and 2012 supported the idea that human activities are altering earth’s climate.. this has been updated and expanded by the study by cornell university that shows the tiny minority of sceptical voices has diminished to almost nothing as evidence mounts of the link between fossil-fuel burning and climate disruption.. the latest survey of peer-reviewed literature published from 2012 to november 2020 was conducted in two stages.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  Ok, so what would a net Carbon zero future look like?

  Will we still be allowed to eat meat?

  Drive cars?

  Go abroad on holiday?

  Will Inuit people be allowed to wear polar bear fur?

  Will Sentinelese people still be allowed to hunt pigs and turtles? (they kill these animals by slitting their throat, you know.)
• 
  146

  Science News article: ‘Case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans

  by Disillusioned JW in

  1. social
  2. current

  a news article has the headline of " ‘case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans"; see https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans .

  the article says in part the following.. 'the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate has passed 99.9%, according to research that strengthens the case for global action at the cop26 summit in glasgow.. the degree of scientific certainty about the impact of greenhouse gases is now similar to the level of agreement on evolution and plate tectonics, the authors say, based on a survey of nearly 90,000 climate-related studies.

  this means there is practically no doubt among experts that burning fossil fuels, such as oil, gas, coal, peat and trees, is heating the planet and causing more extreme weather.. a previous survey in 2013 showed 97% of studies published between 1991 and 2012 supported the idea that human activities are altering earth’s climate.. this has been updated and expanded by the study by cornell university that shows the tiny minority of sceptical voices has diminished to almost nothing as evidence mounts of the link between fossil-fuel burning and climate disruption.. the latest survey of peer-reviewed literature published from 2012 to november 2020 was conducted in two stages.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  'climate emergency'? - who wrote that, Greta Thunberg? lol

  Scientists broadly agree that humans are polluting the planet. But they don't really know how bad the situation is or will be.

  Whenever they say 'hottest or coldest temperature since records began' I have to laugh because our records only go back a couple of centuries. The weather has being going on for hundreds of millions of years, lol.

  All this 'we've got 20 years to save Earth' crap is fear-mongering nonsense, quite similar to how doomsday cults operate.

  It's good to live cleaner, greener lives but don't let scientists who are in the pay of governments scare you or fool you. Treat whatever they say with skepticism.
• 
  55

  Alec Baldwin Shot a Woman Dead

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  so alec baldwin shot a woman dead on set and seriously injured another man.. what do we put this down as?

  a tragic accident?

  maybe ... except that implies no one was to blame.. the more you find out, the more it seems that this was due to negligence and lack of attention to safety.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  @cyberjesus - it was his film.

  Alec Baldwin was one of the producers.

  He has responsibility for the set. And a loaded gun with real bullets was on set - something that is against the rules.
• 
  55

  Alec Baldwin Shot a Woman Dead

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  so alec baldwin shot a woman dead on set and seriously injured another man.. what do we put this down as?

  a tragic accident?

  maybe ... except that implies no one was to blame.. the more you find out, the more it seems that this was due to negligence and lack of attention to safety.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  
  
• 
  22

  Dune (1984) - er, yeah, lol

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. social
  2. entertainment

  so, i saw dune (1984) yesterday.

  i knew it wasn't gonna be great, but deary me.

  i'm not gonna lie - this film is not good, in fact it's laughably bad in places.. first, i'd like to know the thought process that went behind choosing david lynch to write/direct.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  They are doing a podcast on the Islamic influence on the movie Dune - yes, I was gonna mention this in the OP but I forgot all about it.

  I was gonna say this: there are some names in Dune which are clearly influenced by Arabic.

  The main character, Paul Atreides, is also called 'Mu'adib'. This sounds like an Arabic word.

  Also, the planet with the spice is called Arrakiss. And this name sounds like the British English pronunciation of Iraq, with '-iss' added onto the end.

  
  
• 
  7

  Would it be correct to equate Faith and belief in any God with superstitious belief ? I believe so.

  by smiddy3 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  their are millions of peoples all around the world who believe in one god or another christian and non christian.. all of them pray to their gods for this, that, and the other.

  by far the majority never hear god answer them audibly ,however most assume he answers their prayers or not , by what transcribes next in their lives.. you pray for what is right according to god and he answers your prayers ,otherwise your prayers are not answered .. those few who who do claim to hear the voice of god audibly are usually found to have mental problems ,either physical or emotional.. if you do good you will be rewarded either now or in the hereafter , if you do bad you will feel the wrath of god and his judgments.

  i equate this with superstitious beliefs ,what do you think ?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  Yes, Smiddy, I agree with you.

  But there must have been some value in religious behaviour, otherwise natural selection would have deleted it.

  It's quite a fascinating topic.

  I wonder if there are any fossilised religious sites, made by early Homo sapiens or other human species?