OneEyedJoe

Joined

• started 34 topics
• posted 2,930 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by OneEyedJoe

• 
  17

  "But it gives my life meaning"

  by Coded Logic in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  it's not enough that we simply raise empirical challenges to these iron age beliefs saying, "jesus didn't really rise from the dead" or "muhammad didn't really fly to heaven on a horse.

  " we must also give no quarter to this falsehood that religion can give peoples lives real meaning.

  the truths about our identity, experience, and the future impacts that our decision will have on the world around us are much deeper and more profound than any culture or religion.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  There's plenty enough bad about religion to focus on without trying to trash all of it at once which simply won't work. Focus on the abusive behavior and child mutilation
  

  It takes all kinds. Some people can be persuaded away from their harmful beliefs and practices by being shown that they aren't necessary to give their lives meaning, and some people can be persuaded that their lives can be endowed with meaning another way once they realize that the current source of meaning stems from fundamentally harmful beliefs and practices. Saying that one shouldn't make a point that favors a lack of belief in a deity because it's somehow the wrong way to talk people out of their belief is, in my opinion, a completely indefensible position to take.

  I agree that we should let people have their privately held superstitions as long as they don't impose them on others, but I fail to see how pointing out just how unnecessary those superstitions are will somehow weaken the case against belief without evidence.
• 
  37

  Watchtower teaches that Jesus dying on the stake is no longer certain

  by Listener in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the watchtower has held for many years that jesus died on a stake and held strongly to this teaching.

  w 1951 3/15 the above agrees with the new world translation of the christian greek scriptures in its appendix, page 769, in saying that the instrument upon which jesus was nailed was a stake without a crossbeam, and not the religiously represented “cross”; and that the greek word used for that instrument in ancient time meant a “stake” and not the conventional religious cross.

  they are no longer certain on this point.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Their website also says that they don't shun those that leave, they're not a cult because they don't follow men, they don't believe in creationism , they haven't changed their Bible to fit their beliefs, etc. Until this is in a WT, I'm just going to assume that they're just lying to the public to make their cult more palatable as is their MO.
• 
  11

  Evolution is a Fact #40 - What Use is Half an Eye?

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  creationists often refer to the words of darwin when he pondered the evolution of the complex eye.

  he said that to suppose that the complex eye evolve by natural selection seems "absurd in the highest possible degree".

  what they always ignore is that darwin went right on in the very next sentence to propose how the eye could have evolved and that numerous gradations must exist between the simplest light detecting organs and the complex vertebrate eye.. in the 150 years since darwin published his book not only have those gradations been discovered in the natural world but the very genes that build the eye have been discovered by science.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Another common argument that's along the same lines and, I think, is a more compelling example is "What good is half a heart?" I once saw Richard Dawkins answer this very question, though: small animals (insects, etc.) don't need a heart because just their body movement circulates fluids sufficiently. Then as they got bigger, they developed what is basically an artery with some muscles around it that just add a little bit of a pumping motion to push fluids around. Then as they get bigger, that adaptation continues to gain complexity and centralizes until you have a heart.

  I think there's two flaws that people have in thinking about this argument that makes it persuasive. First, "half a heart" is sufficiently close to the concept of "half way along the path to a modern heart" that it seems compatible with their idea of what the theory of evolution posits, but it generates an obviously flawed mental picture (a heart cut in half) that would be absurd to think an animal could survive with. Second, people tend to think about the evolution of individual features in isolation from one another. It's easy to forget that the heart evolved at the same time that body size and metabolic rates were also changing.
• 
  11

  Evolution is a Fact #40 - What Use is Half an Eye?

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  creationists often refer to the words of darwin when he pondered the evolution of the complex eye.

  he said that to suppose that the complex eye evolve by natural selection seems "absurd in the highest possible degree".

  what they always ignore is that darwin went right on in the very next sentence to propose how the eye could have evolved and that numerous gradations must exist between the simplest light detecting organs and the complex vertebrate eye.. in the 150 years since darwin published his book not only have those gradations been discovered in the natural world but the very genes that build the eye have been discovered by science.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Creationists often refer to the words of Darwin when he pondered the evolution of the complex eye. He said that to suppose that the complex eye evolve by natural selection seems "absurd in the highest possible degree". What they always ignore is that Darwin went right on in the very next sentence to propose how the eye could have evolved and that numerous gradations must exist between the simplest light detecting organs and the complex vertebrate eye.

  This very misquote in the creation book is what flipped the switch for me from "it still could be the truth" to "it's definitely a cult." Everything I'd seen in my research (much of it on jwfacts.com) up to that point (607, child abuse, various fairly obvious doctrinal flaws, etc) I had a way to rationalize. Obviously it was all building my already substantial doubts, but seeing this misquote, followed by the statement that scientists still hadn't resolved the problem (when Darwin himself did in the very next sentence) I couldn't rationalize away as anything other than an outright lie, staring at me in black and white.

  The cult (and indeed all religions) would do well to invest their time in rationalizing how their religious tradition is still significant in the light of the fact of evolution and other scientific facts than spreading outright lies that are so easily exposed as this one.
• 
  21

  The spinning blade of a Sword and the 2 Angels guarding the gate....

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  for some reason i found myself shaking my head once again in disbelief at the story in genesis.. amongst all things, the very concept of a "flaming sword" spinning around and blocking the "entrance to the garden of eden" is so stupid!.

  do people really believe that as a fact?.

  seriously, swords were not even invented at that time!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  I never thought about the fact that this would mean that god invented weaponry. I think in general people just take for granted that swords have always existed, at least I did. Just another plot hole in what has to be one of the most poorly thought out books ever written, I guess.
• 
  17

  Good luck with that

  by Lost his mind in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what is the big deal when you say "good luck with that" or he just had bad luck?

  i have never been a jw, but what is the problem with saying these things?

  my husband was so mad, he went to bed and would not talk to me.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Sounds like the phobia indoctrination (which is probably one of the most persistent parts of the cult mind control) still has a hold on him. It'd probably be worthwhile to try to expose him to information about how cult brainwashing works - once you lay bare the mechanism of the indoctrination, it loses most of its power. The books by Steve Hassan (www.freedomofmind.com) are really good for this purpose.

  I hope he's able to get completely free.
• 
  17

  Good luck with that

  by Lost his mind in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  what is the big deal when you say "good luck with that" or he just had bad luck?

  i have never been a jw, but what is the problem with saying these things?

  my husband was so mad, he went to bed and would not talk to me.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Just wait until he sneezes and you say "bless you."

  It's a cult. They're conditioned to strongly reject very common things. Phrases like good luck and bless you. Objects like crosses and steeples. Personal choices like beards, long hair on men, piercings, etc. These are all things that they've been conditioned to recognize as "worldly" which, in turn, is recognized as being evil, lying in the hand of satan, and a part of satan's wicked system of things. This is designed such that outsiders can't help but give themselves away as being an outsider in a way that any JW will be all too aware of. This builds walls between the JW and the non-JW to prevent them from developing relationships outside the cult that might undermine the cult's control and leave them with a system of support should they ever consider leaving.
• 
  39

  (Not so) Subliminal Shave Your Beard Message

  by Funchback in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i'm in the middle of dissecting the june 2017 jw broadcasting video.. in the first minute, they summarize a story about a guy who apparently was a one-time bad ass (showed a picture of him with a beard while posing on a chopper).

  then, they show him shaving at the exact same moment the narrator is saying how he regained "a clean conscience".. this no-beard obsession by the jws is beyond nuts.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  John, you're missing the point altogether. The beard thing is about hypocrisy. They're obsessed with beards when it doesn't make sense to be. There's no prohibition on beards in the bible, and they claim to be lead solely by the bible. In fact there's explicit instruction in the bible that men have beards, and they use an adjacent verse to justify their prohibition on tattoos. Hypocrites. They say they rely on bible principles and leave things to the conscience of their members where the scriptures aren't clear, yet they ban beards. Hypocrites. They criticize other religions for violating Paul's instruction not to go beyond the things written in scripture, yet they ban beards. Hypocrites. It's such an insane place for them to make a stand, and as such it stands out. It's possibly one of the clearest places to see how rigid and intrusive their control is. And when you understand how cult brainwashing works, it begins to make perfect sense. The beard ban is one of the places where the cult exposes itself in every way for what it is.

  Another thing that makes the beard ban such a sticking point is that it's something that no one has any emotional attachment to. No one has died refusing to grow a beard for the cult, so there's hesitance to accept that the ban may be wrong due to a refusal to accept that people died for nothing (as there is with the blood ban). Adding to that the explicit biblical ban on shaving, and the fact that many men would like to grow a beard it leaves this issue as a unique seam that can allow someone to start to break into the cult mind control.
• 
  19

  Gog of Magog - Watchtower says it has two identities

  by Listener in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  the searcher started a topic addressing the gt, a comment from sparrowdown asked an interesting question -.

  "...the political powers of satan's world will form a coalition..."that's the statement that interests me.

  what are they alluding to?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  When will people get a clue, these idiots just write stuff to keep people enslaved, they have no clue what their writtings.
  

  At least for me, doing this sort of analysis is more about a fascination with how I was ever fooled by them when there are plot holes scattered literally everywhere.

  I hope your summary is correct ,because if it is , it should wake up a lot more old timers and hopefully others that this religion just makes things up as the years drag on.
  

  I predict that no one will wake up due to this particular failure of interpretation. It's too impersonal a doctrine to base the enormous decision/commitment of leaving the cult on. Anyone that sees the holes will just say "well that doesn't make sense, they'll probably clarify this soon." Really, anything in revelation (an exception being the literal nature of the 144k, probably) is a little thin to wake someone up - at least I don't think I'd ever have committed to doing research on whether the cult is really 'the truth' based on the interpretation of an exiled old man's fever dream.
• 
  8

  Does anyone know how many partook of the emblems last memorial ?

  by Chook in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i think this is the only growth area in jw land..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Those numbers mean nothing.

  In the Spanish congs here, I know of about 5 nutty women who partake. At least 3 of these ladies are flat out crazy, on meds for depression, bipolar, C-R-A-Z-Y!!!

  Who really knows what the batshit crazy stuff found in Revelations really means.

  The elders are supposed to harass anyone who partakes to see if it's valid before they're counted, so theres a fair chance they're not counting them. In my experience, though, anyone who partakes is a bit off their rocker (i mean they'd have to be, they have to essentially be hearing voices to qualify). In any event it's an interesting metric given that they so frequently stated that the dwindling number was a sign of the nearness of the end and now it's on the rise.

  I think they advance some of the yearbook report at the annual meeting talks, that includes the memorial attendance and participants.

  This from memory, I might be wrong.

  Yeah, sometimes they'll publish key stats in WT study articles towards the end of the year, or they'll announce it at the annual meeting.