hi blondie
Do I understand that congregations have no choice to send
all but $5,000 in their savings to the WTS?
TL;DR - the WT are actually very effectively disincentivizing
donations
In reality it means there is a huge disincentive to contribute
anything but a bare minimum to local funds
Coupled with the fact that the WT have now 'unlinked' the monetary
donations from the visible results of building/refurbishing a hall
Means a collapse in donations
Scenario One: When a congregation has a prospective kingdom
hall to buy - a 'project' - the locals are willing to contribute, often a
lot... local enthusiasm drives donations... and they can see the tangible
results
Scenario Two: WT oversees new halls AND pays for it from
central funds - much less incentive to contribute... much less enthusiasm (what
do locals actually DO - the LDC comes in and builds it for them!)
Result - donations plummet
Think how 'wordly' charities drive contributions - sponsor a
child, sponsor a dog, pay for a month's supply of food, get letters from your
sponsored child/dog/cat, get updates – charities are eager to give people a
tangible result from their donation. They want to incentivize continuing
donations (the adverts - just $3 dollars a month, donate the price of a coffee
each week etc, an ongoing donation, a monthly direct debit, only $3 or $5 a month!) and they focus increased donations with special appeals, often with specific goals.
WT is doing the reverse in overdrive - no goals such as a new hall or even XX amount of $$ needed for such-and-such, no physical new
releases at Convention to donate for, less monthly magazines to donate for -
vicious circle - the less tangible physical items you give to people, the less
donations/money you get in return.
SIDENOTE - generally the differance in contributions made between a one day and a two day circuilt assembly was MUCH less in proportion than it 'should' have been - basically publishers didn't contribute double for the two day than what they contributed for the one day, a bit more maybe yes, but not double, no where near
People's concept of digital items is much less than for
physical items - why was napster so popular? downloading a computer file of
music is totally different in most people's minds to getting a physical CD.
Yes, I’m sure, if a congregation has a new hall built for
them, contributions will go up – but no where nearly as much when it was ‘their
personal congregation’s project.’
And for the other congregations?
If you merge or combine congregations together you are disincentivizing
donations (well there’s more publishers now, so running costs are reduced, so
your donation can be reduced)
If you move a congregation to another hall you are disincentivizing
donations (well our car gas cost has gone up, and besides, running costs for
the hall are shared between more congregations)
Result? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_storm