Ok, Little Toe, I think I get it. It`s like the holy Trinity of "regular" Christianity: Logically an impossibility, but that`s just another sign of it`s divine nature...? Something like that? So the distinction makes the free will-issue into a "both,as man has free will, but God has still pre-ordained it or whatever"-thing? And yes, it`s inlogical, but that makes it really mystic and therefore cool and acceptable? (I am not mocking you, seriously, I am mocking religion)..But philosophically it won`t work. Philosophically or scientifically, God can`t have preordained everything, but still have made room for mans individual choice. Because, if God, in his "planning" of the future for mankind, would have to take into consideration the choices men make (he has foresight, and knows what they`ll do), he really isn`t preordaining it at all! Because He would have to plan "around" the choices MEN make, so therefore it isn`t him preordaining it! Or?...have I misunderstood?