While many among the Watchtower's leadership are no doubt sincere, there is no proof
that all are. More than this, in examining the life of a man like Rutherford - complete with
his habits involving cruelty, alcohol, greed , reviling others, neglect of his family and contempt
for women - it becomes evident that cynical men may take the lead in particular. Such
individuals may possess the needed talents and unabashed drive required to zealously
recommend rank deceptions that fuel the Watchtower's growth.
Underneath the Society's exterior of plastic smiles, this week's Watchtower Study
reminded me of just how contemptuous their deception can be ( WT. Jan. 15, 2005 pg. 14)
The "Do You Recall" section asked "What did Jesus mean when he said John would
remain until he came?"
I was astonished. The scripture, quoted in plain sight, said "If it is my will for [John]
to remain until I come, of what concern is that to you?" ( John 21). Anybody in the
audience could simply read the cited text and reason that Jesus didn't promise anything to
John. He simply said "if". Yet, here was the Watchtower ignoring the text for anyone
to see ---- and no one did!
Have they lost it completely? Are they even trying anymore? Do they even have to,
if no Witness even bothers to read the text word for word?
It should be evident that , to the Watchtower, the Bible has any meaning they care to
impose upon it and no one will even notice. It just doesn't matter.
If this really is the correct state of affairs in the organization, then they can change
anything because the Bible means anything they wish. It would only take a
successful lawsuit here or there, or some external obstacle that gets in their way,
for them to dump any of the many obnoxious features of this cult, without a second
thought about a Holy Book that holds them back. You just 'spin' the change and and
voila! , the Witness thralls/drones/zombies fall into line!
So here's the paradox: Is the greatest hope for reforming the Watchtower actually to
be gained from its worst leaders and not the most sincere?
Maybe our best hope, as 'apostates'
comes from other 'apostates'!
metatron