ThiChi
Some claim Occam's razor can be used to support creationism over evolution. After all, having God create everything is much simpler than evolution, which is a very complex mechanism...
Oh for god's sake Thi Chi; some might say what you say above, but then they don't understand Occam's Razor. Ngh! Have the honesty to admit your belief in Creation is presuppositionalistic.
I'm surprised you're still flogging the dead horse, I mean Behe...
http://www.google.com/custom?q=Behe&sa=Search&sitesearch=www.talkorigins.org
hooberus
If you are seriously open-minded why not consider the 6-day creation position?
Because it's easy to prove with a saw, sandpaper and a microscope that there were trees growing before 'day one'. And trees still standing which were growing before the Flood.
You've still not refuted this stuff hooberus, you just ignore it and pretend it doesn't matter to your theory of creation.
But without refuting a Bible literalist/YEC paradigm is irrelevent as it is falsified with that and by thousand other strands of evidence.
And you say this is a strawman?
However, a growing number of recent attempts to remove evolutionary theory from the schoolroom, in favor of a "scientific" version of the Biblical Genesis story, demonstrates that the anti-evolutionist movement is still alive and well in America.
So, are you saying the ID movement (which laughs at the YEC possee, by the way) is in no way associated with the Creationist movement? If you can show there is no connection between the two groups, fine. But if there is then accusations of ID being re-warmed Creationism in a Trojan Horse are fair.
Oh, yeah, there's still the big problem that the description of ID refutes ID... pity...
And was blueberry farmer his profession? If they listed people by their profession (and as one is called a vet that seems fair) then what are you complaining about? And what, pray, are his degrees in and where are they from?
