WTS letter to Newlywed (Explicit Content)

by 4JWY 62 Replies latest members adult

• 

  A Paduan

  For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, (like shunning their own children) and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women (like caring more about their doctrine) and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men (like victim blaming) and receiving in their own persons (their new spirit or seven) the due penalty for their error.

  And why did God give them up?

  because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature (the image of a dictator) rather than the Creator

  There is nothing in that passage about "sex".

  take heed then about how you hear, for to him who has more will be given
• 

  exjdub

  4JWY:

  Thanks for sharing the letter.

  While modern sex manuals imply that the

  wife must have a sexual climax every time the couple have sexual

  relations, this is certainly an extreme view

  Is that a quote from "Prudes For Dummies"? Why don't they just pack that letter in with a Jdub marriage starter kit and give it to every newlywed couple? That way they can strip the rest of what little enjoyment is left out of life for a Dub.

  I think Nelly sang it best (I think it is Nelly):

  "I want a lady in the street and a freak in the bed"
• 

  Scully

  4JWY:

  I modified the title of your thread to include an "Explicit Content" warning. For some strange reason, that has a really interesting way of generating LOTS of traffic! LOL

  It seems to me that the Governing Body just assumes that women find sex revolting and disgusting. Reminds me of one of those funny excerpts from medical charts:

  Asked patient if she was sexually active. Patient stated that she usually just lays there.

  Whenever I see that, I wonder if she was a JW. LOL

  It never ceases to amaze me that (in 1983 at least, when Fred Franz was the WTS's president) that 5.5 million people were willing to base their sexual behaviour (married or unmarried) on the opinion of an 80-year-old blind virgin guy.

  Love, Scully
• 

  blondie

  Ok, so basically the WT is saying only mission sex, maybe one or two other positions as long as you keep it away from the back door, and oh it's most important that the man gets his satisfaction, the wife should just be happy that she has a man. Yeah Right..............

  Good summary, Attila. Imagine that it took the WTS several pages to convey the same thought. Blondie
• 

  stillajwexelder

  I will have to have my husband get it on here if it's not too hard.

  word choice?
• 

  Maverick

  Funny stuff! The WTS start out talking about Bible principles and then when they needed specifics they had to switch over to quoting, not the Bible but, various WatchTower articles. Maverick
• 

  Sassy

  most of it didn't surprise me..........however your highlighted section certainly received a disgust from me.. dang.. well it is a man's world in the WTS.. so why should it have surprised me.. women are after all only second class citizens.....why is there a need for them to reach orgasm..
• 

  4JWY

  ...thanks for the warning Scully -
• 

  Dan-O

  While modern sex manuals imply that the

  wife must have a sexual climax every time the couple have sexual

  relations, this is certainly an extreme view

  Mrs. O periodically looks over my shoulder here, and has said a couple of times "The more I learn about the witnesses, the less I like them as an organization." I'm sure this snippet from your letter continue to reinforce her views.

  Thanks for posting the letter, 4J. It was an interesting & amusing read.
• 

  Corvin

  If your husband should insist on practices such as oral copulation, despite your at tempts to reason with him and your appeals to respect your con science, we would be unable to advise you specifically as to how you should cope with this development in your marriage. We do not feel that we can accept the responsibility for telling you that you should just submit to his demands, but if you felt that you had no alternative but to submit, letting him take the re sponsibility as your head for his conduct, then that would be a decision for you to make and one for which you would bear respon sibility before Jehovah. The congregation elders would not feel a need to discuss the matter with you, unless you began to dis cuss with others in the congregation what you had decided to do and this became an issue.

  Yikes! What kind of stupid double-speak is that???? It's like they are saying, " . . . if he insists on a blowjob, we can't tell you to go ahead and submit, but if you do submit then you can blame him when Jehovah asks an accounting of you. Just don't go around telling everybody else you are blowing your husband or everyone else will want to do it too, or else we will have to haul you into a committee meeting . . . mmm yeah baby!"

  While modern sex manuals imply that the wife must have a sexual climax every time the couple have sexual relations, this is certainly an extreme view

  This is not an extreme view! This is why so many Elder's wives have a pissy look on their faces all the time. There is a reason why my wife smiles all the time and it is not because I she is remembering a Knock-knock joke.

  Corvin