Where have the NWT Bible changed verses to fit their theology ?

by smiddy3 32 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • waton
    waton
    Very soon that Zombie event would be eliminated from the NWT.

    AS: if the mightiest force in the universe, and there are truly mighty forces at play here, can not manage not come up with a clear text,

    how about the rest of the fantasy tale that rests on that foundation?

  • EverApostate
    EverApostate
    Very soon that Zombie event would be eliminated from the NWT.

    Thats what makes me angry over the Bible. Mindless and reckless writings all over the Bible, for the gullible to believe. Sorry Christians.
    And I was a fool for 11 years believing and preaching these nonsense.

  • jp1692
    jp1692

    I was recently shocked to discover that they've removed John 8:1-11, the account of "The Woman Caught in Adultery (Pericope Adulterae)."

  • Vanderhoven7
    Vanderhoven7

    Perhaps because she should at least have been disfellowshipped and shunned.

  • Earnest
    Earnest
    Perhaps because it wasn't written by John.
  • JoenB75
    JoenB75

    Yeah later addition but cute story

  • minimus
    minimus

    Any New World Translation verse that has brackets.

  • JoenB75
    JoenB75

    It is very odd that JWs have a problem the ressurection of the holy ones as they accept other ressurections. To strong attest to his Deity perhaps?

  • HowTheBibleWasCreated
    HowTheBibleWasCreated

    Most of these 'changed' verses are not changed at all. John 1:1 requires and insertaion of "the". Robert Pryce commented on this very fact awhile ao.

    The 'impale' is a word change to keep up with torture stake. (In reality torture stake is valid since a cross is a torture stake)

    The aforementioned John 8:1-11 does not deserve an answer!

    However the largest places in the 1984 NWT were in the Old Testmanet. The changing of Jeremiah 5:8 to include testicles. The dumbass changing of Job 6:6 from Mallows to 'slimey juice of a marshmellow'.

    The insertation of {other} in brakets in the NT is somewhat questionable as in {in union} but since the theology of each book preaches a different Jesus it is hard to harmonize the NT

    The insertation of Jehovah into the NT is a half-done job since serveal translations have YHWH in the NT many more times then the Watchtower. The fact is that replacing the word Lord with Jehovah ruins the text sicne it is obvious that the author of the Gospel of John and many Pauline letters are not preaching the same God as YHWH but a higher God.(YHWH is a demierage)

  • Vanderhoven7
    Vanderhoven7

    Replacing Kurios with Jehovah 237 times in the New Testament certainly legitimizes, in the mind of Witesses anyway, the Watchtower's emphasis on the name Jehovah.

    Sadly, over half those insertions are not based on quotations from the Old Testament where the Tetragrammatton is found. So the majority of replacements are designed simply to support Watchtower doctrine.

    It's rather revealing that they ignore certain NT quotations from the OT where the Tetragrammatton is found as in Philippians 2:11 which reads

    And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is LORD, to the glory of God the Father.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit