Evolution is a Fact #38 - The Origin of Complex Cells

by cofty 71 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • cofty
    cofty

    Pathetic.

    You claim to be a microbiologist and you can't explain your objection in your own words.

  • cofty
    cofty

    From our previous conversation on this topic. See link

    The objections to this theory and article are all mine (and in my own words), - Vidqun

    That is a lie.

    The post in question consists of 443 words. Being generous at least 336 of those are a direct copy-paste from aWiki article...

    That's 75% of your post.

    1 - You didn't provide a source.

    2 - You dishonestly claimed the article "reveals a few flaws with the theory". It does not.

  • Vidqun
    Vidqun

    Cofty, what is wrong with you? Please follow the numbers.

  • Vidqun
    Vidqun

    You've said it and I repeat: "OBJECTIONS TO THIS THEORY AND ARTICLE ARE ALL MINE." I used the article and OBJECTED to some of the contents. I used the article as backbone and commented and/or objected to it. What is so difficult about that?

  • cofty
    cofty

    For the fifth time your post consists almost entirely of copy-paste. You have even double-pasted most of it.

    Once again you refuse to provide a link to the source.

    The last time you did this you claimed "The objections to this theory and article are all mine (and in my own words)"

    I found the source and proved it was at least 75% word-for-word copy-paste.

    You lied!

    You claim to be a professional microbiologist and yet not only can you not explain your objections in your own words but you don't seem to understand the importance of avoiding plagiarism.

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    I can't believe a microbiologist would cut and paste bullcrap from Michael Behe.

  • Vidqun
    Vidqun

    And I quote: "The Wiki article reveals a few flaws with the theory symbiogenesis." Go and look it up. I could not access your article, so I used Wiki instead.

    I used the Wiki-article to point out the flaws, and I wrote it out and commented on the article. No copy and paste. Makes me think: Farting against thunder, flogging a dead horse, yeah, both of you. Cantleave, is that the best you can do?

  • cofty
    cofty
    No copy and paste

    Liar.

    The post in question consists of 443 words. Being generous at least 336 of those are a direct copy-paste from aWiki article...

    That's 75% of your post.

  • cofty
    cofty
    "The Wiki article reveals a few flaws with the theory symbiogenesis."

    It did not. It discussed the positive evidence for endosymbiosis. the "flaws" were all in your imagination as I explained.

  • Vidqun
    Vidqun

    Cofty, whatever you see or say, the above are the reasons for what I believe, similar to your initial post. That's what you believe, isn't it? You are allowed to say your say, but I am not? Like it or lump it.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit