The addition of the two websites logos and websites to the back cover adds further information as the clause makes out.
Thus there is a very strong case for fair use here. An out of print book was reprinted with addative commentary for non-profit purposes. this is American fair use by definition. I've backed it up with sources a-plenty.
Good grief, your logic is laughable.
So if I take something and put my logo on it then it's suddenly OK because that's "fair use" ?
So I could reprint Twilight, Harry Potter and 50 Shades of Shit and claim it's OK as long as I also add some advertising to it as well?!
You sir, are deluded beyond belief.