If YOU Were In Charge of the COVID Virus Situation How Would You Handle Things At This Point?

by minimus 33 Replies latest jw friends

  • WTWizard
    WTWizard

    I would put a stop to these stupid mask policies and this "social(??)" distancing that accomplishes nothing useful. And, anyone that tries blocking real cures for this, or any other disease, would find themselves in Guantanamo Bay for doing this--including the FDA, WHO, CDC, and other Rockefeller funded organizations keeping this medical cult going. You want to keep hydroxychloroquine off the market? You just got yourself a one-way ticket to Guantanamo Bay.

    In the meantime, I would do things that really work. Nothing like ramping up zinc gluconate production along with quercetin (which is safe, being a bioflavonoid) to make coronavirus nothing more than a stupid little cold, if that. Go ahead and try giving someone coronavirus who is taking these supplements and is not deficient in several key vitamins (vitamin D included), and see how little that accomplishes.

    Of course, some things would remain shut down for good. Chemtrails, which block sunshine so you can't make vitamin D (plus poisons the air and water), would be shut down forever. As would church--because churches only serve to transfer energy to the reptilians so we can all be enslaved. I would make school back to a learning institution, instead of indoctrination--common core has no place in school. (And watch the average first grader master multiplication and division in about 5 minutes before the end of the year.)

  • Simonsez
    Simonsez

    Omg please give me a scientific basis for your claims. They just are not true.

  • shadowclone
    shadowclone

    Other examples of socialist dictatorship:

    Have to wear a seatbelt

    Have to put baby in a special car seat

    Can't smoke in restaurant

    Have to get my car inspected

    My new house has to be built to code

    Can't drink a few and drive

    Have to wear a mask to go to the store

    What happened to our freedoms?

  • Simon
    Simon
    I agree with the statement, but that's dictatorship - Nazis are just as guilty of it as Communists.

    Newsflash: the Nazis were socialists, they competed for the same audience as the communists. Just different factions of the same fucktards.

  • FedUpJW
    FedUpJW

    The fact that the news reports cases, and not deaths, and that the hospitals are no-where near regular capacity shows this is now a nothing-burger and we need to get back to work.

    Exactly! A state in the upper mid-west United States reports they have 3200 hospital beds available. Active COVID-19 cases requiring hospital beds? 116! Yet the lying New York toilet paper Times says that state is running out of beds. The next state south? They are now counting and including as COVID-19 cases even suspected cases. They are also going back to deaths from several weeks ago and now counting them as COVID-19 whether that was the real cause of death or not, and they openly admit it! Got to ramp up the numbers to keep the fear and panic going.

    If I had the authority, I would stop the foolishness, get everyone that is healthy out and about, build the herd immunity, and only quarantine the sick and definitely at risk persons.

  • TheListener
    TheListener

    Freedom cuts both ways

    Not possible to get herd immunity because too many people just simply won't go out. And you can't make them due to freedom.

  • Simon
    Simon
    Not possible to get herd immunity because too many people just simply won't go out. And you can't make them due to freedom.

    This is why mandatory masks and isolation are the wrong approach. It weakens people's immunity response and we need some risk takers to allow a gradual spread. Plenty of people will still wear masks even without it being mandated, but "politicians" ... they can't help but think that they have to make decisions for everyone.

  • minimus
    minimus

    I’m curious if there will be a difference in opening up the country after the election.

  • MeanMrMustard
    MeanMrMustard

    It's about risk, and everyone in a free society should be allowed to assess the risk for themselves. After all, each person is in the best position to make that assessment because they have the most knowledge about their current situation. But people need good information in order to accurately make that assessment. People make risk assessments in their lives everyday. Everything from driving to sky diving - people take the risks because they evaluate the risk and decide the activity is worth it. This is why the one statistic that EVERYONE was interested in since the very beginning was death rate. Not overall infection numbers, not overall deaths - death rate.

    People want some way to measure the risk. As we've been getting more information, it has become clearer and clearer (really not disputed at this point), that the death rate doesn't tick up until you get past 60/70 and/or you have some other aggravating condition. For just about everyone else, the risk is incredibly low.

  • MeanMrMustard
    MeanMrMustard
    I’m curious if there will be a difference in opening up the country after the election.

    Everyone I know assumes that once the election is over, something will happen - maybe we find out that the PCR cycles we too excessive in the testing, or maybe the "experts" decide to level with us about the actual risk in comparison to, say, the flu. This has become so politicized, what else can you assume?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit