That was quick!

by BoogerMan 23 Replies latest social humour

  • cofty
    cofty

    Boogy - Your OP is gibberish.

    What exactly is your point?

    As we ease out of lockdown and introduce mass testing and tracing the government needs the authority to reintroduce local lockdowns as necessary.

    That is how you allow the maximum amount of freedom to the maximum number of people.

    Why do you never just share objective information instead of constantly trying to play Gotcha really badly?

  • cofty
    cofty

    Also your attempts at science are equally woeful. The ability to detect virus particles in a lab at larger distances has little or no bearing on the real world.

    The WHO is recommending 1metre separation. 2 metres reduces the potential viral load as somebody else just said before.

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    Let's wait until the end of the year - when everything will be put on lockdown once again "to save 1000's of lives and the NHS" from the dreaded 'flu - then people can re-examine the Emperor's new clothes.

    So your trying to imply that this particular virus is just a regular common flu.

    Sounds like the Emperor's cloths is covered in idiocy.

  • road to nowhere
    road to nowhere

    Joint biosecurity centre. A bunch of beurocrats with immemse power. They will abuse it, no doubt.

    C19 is reak. The hype is not. The only vaccines ever to work are polio and smallpox. Good luck waiting. I am locking my self in the closet. Sucking my thumb waiting for armageddon.

  • Simonsez
    Simonsez

    Road to nowhere that is just not true!!!! Many vaccines do work. They do reduce the infection rate tremendously. I am tired of hearing from antivaccine crackpots. Have you never heard of measles, diptheria, whooping cough just to name a few!!!

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    A study of more than 44,600 cases confirmed in China by Feb. 11 found more than 81% were mild. For the study, published by China's Center for Disease Control and Prevention, cases were considered mild if a patient did not have pneumonia or only experienced mild pneumonia. In the same study, less than 14% of cases were severe and less than 5% were critical. Severe cases were defined as shortness of breath, low blood oxygen saturation, or other lung problem, while critical cases meant the patient suffered respiratory failure, septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction.

    But the fact that most cases are mild doesn't mean the virus isn't a threat

    Regarding the severity of the illness, a group of scientists wrote in a piece published in the New England Journal of Medicine last week wrote, "In this manner, a virus that poses a low health threat on the individual level can pose a high risk on the population level, with the potential to cause disruptions of global public health systems and economic losses"

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    The attempt to shut down human social environments was to curb the total infection rate over the broad spectrum of the population, which inevitably would reduce the death rates from this virus.

    This scientifically supported acceptance turned out to be true by now known documented effects over populations that had little restrictions. ie. Sweden

    If your the kind of person who apathetically doesn't care about other people in general like most JWS who are patiently waiting for the majority of the world's population to die at Armageddon, well maybe you would object to these shut downs if they imposed some hardship into their own life. ?

  • BoogerMan
    BoogerMan

    LOL. Every human "right" you had 18 weeks ago has been taken away with your full blessing and approval - in order to allegedly "save the NHS and to save lives."

    The NHS is underwhelmed. The SEC in Glasgow which was converted into the NHS Lousia Jordan Hospital, has not had ONE patient, so why are thousands of people still being denied necessary hospital appointments and operations?

    Will you all gladly accept more house-arrest when the'flu season starts? The NHS & lives will have to be saved yet again, won't they?

    Those who embrace the mass-hysteria and propaganda are only too ready to assail those who challenge the official narrative. The same people probably believed in Saddam's WMD.

  • cofty
    cofty

    The NHS wasn't overwhelmed BECAUSE our freedom of movement was restricted. It's not that difficult.

    Do you read the instructions on the shampoo bottle every morning?

  • BoogerMan
    BoogerMan

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-52530518 - "Coronavirus: What am I allowed to do now?"

    Welcome to the increased fines if you or your loved ones are caught visiting each other in your own homes. The screw is turning! Even North Korea isn't this dictatorial!

    But of course only the sheep get fined - not the leaders who impose the laws for others to obey. Suckers!

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/regulation/10#commentary-key-997116697a4ff53eb4b750c98f643851

    Fixed penalty notices

    10. An authorised person may issue a fixed penalty notice to anyone that the authorised person reasonably believes—

    (a) has committed an offence under these Regulations;

    (6) The amount specified under paragraph (5)(c) must, subject to paragraph (7), be £100

    (7) (a) Unless sub-paragraph (b) applies, a fixed penalty notice must specify that if £50 is paid before the end of the period of 14 days following the date of the notice that is the amount of the fixed penalty;

    (ii) the amount specified as the fixed penalty is to be—

    in the case of the second fixed penalty notice received, £200

    in the case of the third fixed penalty notice received, £400;

    in the case of the fourth fixed penalty notice received, £800;

    in the case of the fifth fixed penalty notice received, £1,600;

    in the case of the sixth and subsequent fixed penalty notices, £3,200.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit