Poopie your argument would then be a violation of the other congregation's members civil rights not the civil right of Mr Walls. And you cannot sue over the violation of someone else's right because then you have no standing, your, not the one being harmed and the remedy wouldn't be directed to you.
Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada
by poopie 106 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Fisherman
Poopie, he does not claim that. I think he claims that the JW judicial process is unfair based on contractual relationship and that he suffered damages because of this.
-
Fisherman
I think that a Beth Din can forbid the Jewish community from doing business with a Jew.
-
poopie
civil rights of congregants are also violated? Because if they speak to him they are shunned this there right as a citizen with free speech violated.
-
poopie
The point is no religious law can violate free speech or civil rights of a citizen.The us supreme court has ruled that any citizen can talk to another citizen about anything see watchtower v straton ohio.
-
poopie
to deny a human the right to speak to another human is against universal law.
-
Fisherman
Because if they speak to him they are shunned this there right as a citizen with free speech violated.
JW are only forbidden to fellowship with DF members. It is a personal decision whether or not JW communicate or deal with df JW. You may feel that this violates civil rights but you are wrong because it does not.
-
poopie
not true 1981 wt at says if there is contact must be Df or some other penalty imposed. Greeting is not fellowship.
-
Fisherman
human the right to speak to another human is against universal law.
Secular Courts do this all the time. They call it an "Order of Protection" or a "Restraining Order".
-
poopie
saying a greeting is part of Df decree. 2 john v 9 10 and 11