I have been watching Evans videos for a while. He keeps attacking the cult for following the bible. I.E. women are to be subservient to men. The cult is against homosexuality ect. To me this is not correct. There are two fronts to argue on and they are very different. One is that the cult has set up laws and rules that have no backing in the bible or they have twisted a scripture to reinforce their rule or law. This would be the faithful and discrete slave being the cult GB, or the two witness rule so they don't go to the police or authority's on things such as pedophiles. This is where I believe the cult should be held to account and attacked. Or another example is birthdays, all the end dates that were wrong and that the big A is so close.
The other is Evans will attack the cult for following the bible on Homosexuality, Women's place in the church ect. This is not an argument against the cult its an argument against the bible. Churches that teach its OK to be homosexual are lying as far as to what the bible teaches. The bible is very clear on homosexuality. Its wrong and those who practice it will not go to heaven, live forever on earth or what ever it is you think the reward from god is. I have even heard that well there are only 6 passages in the bible, bla bla bla, Yes but there is only one place in the constitution of the USA that says you have freedom of speech. That does not mean you really don't because there is only one place that says you do.
So to argue that the bible is crazy and stupid and just a book by man is not an argument I think to be used against the cult alone. Its an argument against the bible being the word of god. This is why its not really correct to attack the cult based on its following what is clear in the bible. Any Christian religion that says its really OK to be homosexual, or that women are to not be teaching men, or they need to be subservient to men or any number of nut bar things the bible clearly teaches is really the wrong way to attack the cult. One is to attack Christianity and argue against the whole ideology not just one group who follows it. The other is to argue on points that are unique to the cult only.