Questions from Readers! Blood

by Beans 15 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Beans
    Beans

    Enjoy this tidbit!

    *** w58 8/1 478 Questions from Readers *** Questions from Readers

    ó One of Jehovah’s witnesses who claims to be of the anointed remnant recently went to the hospital and took a blood transfusion, voluntarily. Should she be allowed to partake of the emblems of bread and wine at Memorial time?—R. J., United States.

    We, of course, regret with you that this sister who professes to be one of the anointed remnant took a blood transfusion voluntarily during her stay in the hospital. We believe that she did the wrong thing contrary to the will of God. However, congregations have never been instructed to disfellowship those who voluntarily take blood transfusions or approve them. We let the judgment of such violators of God’s law concerning the sacredness of blood remain with Jehovah, the Supreme Judge. The only thing that can be done in the cases of individuals like this is to view them as immature and therefore not capable of taking on certain responsibilities, hence refusing to make certain assignments of service to such ones.

    Since an individual is not disfellowshiped because of having voluntarily taken a blood transfusion or having approved of a dear one’s accepting a blood transfusion, you have no right to bar this sister from the celebration of the Lord’s Evening Meal. As an anointed member of Christ’s body she is under orders and command by Christ Jesus to partake. Whether she is unfaithful as to what she professes to be by virtue of taking the emblems of the Lord’s Evening Meal is something for Jehovah God to determine himself. His judgment begins at the house of God. It is not for you or anyone serving the Memorial emblems to act as the judge, but to allow the emblems to go to anyone in the audience as these are passed along in the normal manner of letting each one have the opportunity to partake.

    Beans

    http://Quotes.JehovahsWitnesses.com

  • DJ
    DJ

    unbelievable......according to today's light, would she have da'd herself???

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Absolutely incredible.

  • RAYZORBLADE
    RAYZORBLADE

    Damn...lost my original post to this thread.

    Trying again, but this time a few lines instead.

    Well Beans, it's always good to see these things again. It definitely reconfirms my decision to stay miles away from the JWs and the nearest KH.

    When I read these things, it's incredible the amount of double-speak the WTBTS gets away with.

    It's so ambiguous it drives me crazy. (past tense: drove me crazy)

    Thanks Beans.

  • minimus
    minimus

    I remember this WT.QFR. The beauty of this article is that in 1958 Jehovah God, thru His Mouthpiece, decreed that even an anointed one (that should know better) could take a blood transfusion and still be one of God's people, one of His Witnesses! But a few years later, our unchanging perfect God would change His mind and begin to feel that such transfused people are not His, after all. How stupid to think that this "slave class" speaks for God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • metatron
    metatron

    Keep in mind the green elder's manual lists "failure to abstain from blood" as a df'ing offense.

    They kill innocent dupes and nothing changes

    metatron

  • rocketman
    rocketman

    Now, now, MInimus - maybe Jehovah has trouble making up his mind.

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32

    Heh... another example of a "guideline" that is basically a rule. Yeah, you don't have to follow the guideline, but you'll be an immature krischen if you don't.

  • nowisee
    nowisee

    say WHAT?????

    unbelievable.

  • DanTheMan
    DanTheMan

    Old light that will be new light in time.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit