Do You Think Trump Is Done?

by minimus 83 Replies latest jw friends

  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    @TD: Smith was rebuked by Judge Cannon for selecting a Grand Jury outside the jurisdiction (some legal experts say it was convened in New Jersey, for a case being brought in Florida) and subsequently having those records sealed (eg. the charges he used to convince the jury) so the judge nor the defense can see the charges that the prosecution brought. His answer to the judge was basically ‘trust me’. It is very unusual to select a jury outside the district, but to then seal the charges is unheard of.

    It has been speculated in the MSM (aka leaked by the DOJ) that Pence was collaborating with the DOJ and testifying against Trump on the Georgia case. Many in the MSM were saying “we got him this time”, but Pence finally confirmed during a campaign interview that wasn’t the case and everything was above board. Again, it is possible Smith has convened a secret grand jury in another jurisdiction and sealed it. The judge presiding over the Trump-related cases in Georgia is a far-left pro-abortionist to the 9th month with some seriously weird legal statements, one of his more recent was basically ruling that Roe v Wade could not be challenged because it was the law for 50 years (it wasn’t, it was a flawed opinion, not a law) after Roe v. Wade had already been overturned, but he basically ruled that the State can’t challenge Supreme Court rulings.

    MSM = mainstream media. MSN is part of the MSM, but here is a Time magazine article drooling over Jack Smith while simultaneously hedging that he may not get it done: https://time.com/6286746/jack-smith-faces-challenges-in-prosecuting-trump/

    Just look at Smith’s history, an acolyte of Obama, he has a career of doing political hitjobs and losing badly.

  • TD
    TD

    You would think after misinterpreting the law, improperly asserting jurisdiction and getting slapped on the wrist pretty hard by the Eleventh Circuit Court, Judge Cannon would be a bit more careful, considering her lack of experience.

    Here is one of the kinder recaps of what happened just a few months ago:

    https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/11th-circuit-vacates-cannons-order-appoint-special-master-mar-lago-investigation

    I don't believe Judge Cannon's demand for a brief is a rebuke in and of itself. Exactly what law or federal guideline does she think is in question here?

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6

    This was an NSU law professor's comment: (The gentleman's name is Tom Jarvis and the article is behind a paywall, so I'm going to quote it here.)

    "There is no issue...Obviously prosecutors are entitled to use multiple grand juries and can empanel grand juries in each and every district where they believe a crime or part of a crime has occurred."

    I also think the term, "submitted under seal" might be misinterpreted. The "seal" prevents the document from becoming a public record for a length of time (Usually specified)

    You can go to Court Listener, for example, and read the entire docket if you want. What the general public won't be able to read are those filings submitted under seal, but it would be a mistake to infer from this that the filing is also concealed from the judge and defense attorneys.

    This actually connects to yesterday's (Friday) D.C. hearing. (United States v Donald Trump) The DOJ's concern is that Trump will disclose sensitive information, as in names of witnesses that were sealed. --To which John Lauro, Trump's own attorney said (In apparent frustration) that he was unable to "babysit" his client 24/7.

  • Samcats
    Samcats

    Anony mous, my hat's off to you as you are a veritable geyser of misinformation!

    A natural talent or did you study to be so disconnected from reality?

  • MeanMrMustard
    MeanMrMustard

    Aaannnnd now the GA indictment drops.

    RICO?! RICO! Lol. Good lord.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit