Twitch: "Neptune and Pluto do not fit the predictions. Not sure what you see, your horrendous prose notwithstanding
In the series that starts with Mercury, Pluto fits the predictions, (look at the figures: 388 vs 39,61 !! but Neptune is outside that series. with "witness" I meant JW. in wt bible symbolism, 10 stands for earthly completeness, "10 kings" is taken to mean all the kings. The jw mind would have an aha moment linking the bible, his digits and the bode no. 10.
S: "What pulsation sources in the sun? --
I am making only assumptions here, 25 years ago there was the 5 minute pulsation, the ringing of a bell the wobbling like jellow, pudding. somebody at the time send me an animation that showed how many, or just two agitating sources like the many convection cell in the sun would produce a grid-like force field. When I say standing waves, they do not have to be absolutely staionary. think how the repeated presence of Jupiyer for example has carved out the gaps, concentrations of the asteroids.
S: " what are the points called where interfering waves reinforce each other and where they reduce each other?
In my paper I called them nodes, but they would be the circles where the present orbit find themselves. , The orbital positions of the Trojans are of interest, because they too contain the radius that has resulted from the doubling. Octaves in music create a harmonic resonance and the planetary field would have such harmonics, if one considered the whole as a chladni plate vibrated by the central sun.
S: "Are you saying God told you "everything is waves?"
God does not talk to me and do not hear voices, but I am constantly looking for new insights, often in parallels, similarities, or not. Being isolated on a beach --as I was--,the pebbles, the sand, the sandbanks, the ripples the waves, Of course I think it's created using similar methods, with the " look what I did. examine it and copy!" sign attached to it. . Schroedinger is said to have done good work in similar, but mountain isolation like that.
T: Do you mean to say now that light is a factor that proves exceptions to the Titius-Bode rule? How does light affect the planets' orbits?
of course it does, particularly when these orbits were created out of the contracting dust cloud, where particles were small and still subject to the Pointing Robertson effect, for a version of which I have a US patent. But mainly I was referring to light's speed "c".-- magnetism's effects, gravity's effect or even gravitons are believed to all travel at c. so any "action over distance" would shape those orbits as they settle into their natural law determined orbits. I am not critiquing the Bode law with its equation, The presence of Neptune, halfway between the 196 and 388 position makes it untenable. A "c" based model I am advocating is more fitting, imho. and is so fitting. c = 300 000 km/sec. The earth orbit diameter (related) to IAU is 1000 seconds. our noses are being rubbed into this.
