For those that went to Public School... the scientific method is:
- Characterizations (observations, definitions, and measurements of the subject of inquiry)
- Hypotheses (theoretical, hypothetical explanations of observations and measurements of the subject)
- Predictions (inductive and deductive reasoning from the hypothesis or theory)
- Experiments (tests of all of the above)
Vic Cundiff has over 248 episodes from different eyewitnesses of encounters with the Dogman. That is evidence! Now the evidence must be examined throughly and then tested in harmony with the scientific method to attempt to verify a hypothesis as true.
Have John.Prestor and Finklestein throughly examined & tested the evidence? No. So my statement is true.
"The assumptions that you make "because biology TELLS us they don't" is thoroughly inconsistent with the scientific method."
Or are you guys simply believers in the 2 witness rule?