# STAY ALIVE 'TIL 2132! -- Generation (X′+X″) <= (1914+λ[A′]-α[A′]+λ[A″]-α[A″]-x) <= 2132

by Gilgamesh 24 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• ##### Ucantnome

You’ll get your due in 2072!

that's the date i arrived at

• ##### wallsofjericho

This guy again

what were his other user names?

i can't remember anymore

• ##### Half banana

The answer is very easy. When the writers put the words into Jesus' mouth it was meant to be his own generation. Jesus was supposed to be thirty three when he died, about the normal length of a modern generation; between grandparent and grandchild (it would have been shorter back then).

Jesus failed miserably in his prophecy as have all subsequent notions of extending further dates to it. Calculations are a total waste of time when dealing with fairy tales.

• ##### never a jw

Keeping Occam's razor in mind, I decided to reduce your formula to its bare minimum

1914 = C+R+A+P

• ##### Heaven

half banana said: Jesus failed miserably in his prophecy as have all subsequent notions of extending further dates to it.

When I was younger, I used to be wonder why the Jews didn't follow and accept Jesus as their Messiah and saviour.

The only conclusion I could come up with was he had to have been viewed as some sort of nutbag.

Just like how we view present day people claiming to be Jesus/the Messiah.

• ##### steve2

What the GB make convoluted, Gilgamesh makes even more convoluted.

• ##### prologos

remember Einstein's simple e=mc^2 equation. and he was right.

wt is wrong about the overlap, but, for laughs, : it could go to 2075. seen by the simple formula:

double the years "in the truth" (call it wt) of an anointed since 1914 to get the possible Armageddon date.

1914+2wt=A example: G Gangas RIP 1996 (from jwfacts) Gangas' wt was 82 years 1914 +2x82 = 2078

• ##### Half banana
Not to belittle your entertaining efforts Gigamesh but of course there is no sensible purpose in deriving dates from emotionally driven religious hopes.

A wrong foundation year of 607BCE plus Jesus' failure of prophetic fulfillment in "this generation" as he plainly meant: "his OWN generation", leaves us with such an attenuated piece of speculation, it is an exercise as useful as stretching dead dodos. It is as practical as a hippopotamus on tall stilts for as we know the WT paradise and Armageddon are not real things.

• ##### truthseeker100

I think prologos is off a bit in his calculation. Since there was no year zero we have to subtract 1 from 1914=1913

why not subtract zero? Because zero plus one = 1

1913 is the 293 prime number and the 125 th prime between 1001 and 2000.

All prophesies are prime so wouldn't it be appropriate for the prime fulfillment of Jehovah's prophesy to come to pass after 2000 but not before 125 years have passed thus indicating we are indeed very well along in the last days and conclusion of this system of things. So simple its almost stupid!

In next week's study we will examine what a week and a year really indicate in terms of prime fulfillment of prophesy.

##### truthseeker100an hour ago

I think prologos is off a bit in his calculation. Since there was no year zero we have to subtract 1 from 1914=1913

why not subtract zero? Because zero plus one = 1

ts 100. I accounted for the errors by rounding down the gangas figures from 2078 to 2075. to view the whole od-timer extended figures, gangas, poetzinger et al go the the "High Times " thread please.

formula: 2 times publisher time since 1914 plus 1914 equals A. bang.