Abaddon said: The theory of god fails to explain why god is not subject to observation, so you can't really make to much of that point, especially as the lack of proof is something you have (yawn) consistantly failed to answer. However, there is evidence supporting the theory of macro-evolution. What evidence do you have to support the theory of god? Yet another thing you've failed to answer. What's your excuse going to be this time?
Your argument about showing that "god is not subject to observation" and "what evidence do you have to support the theory of god" is not the issue. Everyone agrees that god is not subject to observation. Also the evidence for the theory of the existence of God is another topic.
The issue here is "Evolution or Creation" The evidence for the creation of any object, from cars to computers is independant of the evidence of a creator for them existing. For example I drive a 1988 Chevrolet pick-up. I did not observe its creation, nor do I even have a clue of who the particular individuals were who may have made it. However I can appeal to present observations about the truck to show evidence that it was created as opposed to evolving from roller-skates. Hense to show evidence that it was created I do not need to "prove the theory of General Motors" or show that "General Motors exists" This same logic can be applied to biological structures, as earlier I said:
"while creation itself was not observed by man, the site I listed appeals to observations from the present world to show evidence (from science) for creation."