Well, I've said my bit, so I'm saying no more. So there.
Am I damaging the silentlambs cause?
by Simon 102 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
refiners fire
Ah. I think I knew without knowing, if you know what i mean.
-
teejay
So if supporting Bill, thus taking the spotlight off of the one that should be getting the credit (according to some), is damaging the cause then I guess the answer would be yes.
But, if supporting Bill in an effort to help bring the WT policies out into the public eye showing how they cause harm to those who have been victimized by others is damaging the cause, then the answer would be no. -- plmkrzy
There it is. It all depends on what "cause" you're talking about. Well said, Plum.
If THE CAUSE is about who ("rightfully"?) gets the credit for 'breaking the story', maybe Simon has been a bump in the road to that end.
If, OTOH, THE CAUSE is simply about shedding light on the plight of JW kids who are defenseless targets of protected pedos in their midst (regardless of who gets the 'credit'), then Simon (aka JW.com) has been of inestimable value. I mean... answering the question posed by this thread is a no-brainer.