London Times On America, Both Viewpoints:

by Englishman 12 Replies latest jw friends

  • Englishman
    Englishman

    July 04, 2002 The Times. London.

    Why we should all love America
    by Michael Gove

    Independence Day, the Fourth of July: Our correspondent salutes the US as a beacon of freedom and castigates those behind the current trend for sneering and sniping at America

    Butt-kickin, profit-takin, race-baitin, weight-throwin, tree-loggin, bible-bashin, US of A. Doesnt this globally dominant brand of a nation, this artificial confection of empty froth and saccharine sweetness, aggressive hype and disdain for good taste, make you sick? Now that the bubbles that were supposed to give it zing (from Enron to WorldCom, dot-coms to soccer moms) have all gone flat, isnt there something rather gut-rotting about America? You bet your life there isnt.

    This Fourth of July, the most significant date in Americas year since September 11, will be celebrated across the nation as few before it. In the ten months since thousands were killed in the worlds worst terrorist attack, America has been challenged as seldom before. And come through. It is hard now to recall the full shock, intensity, wickedness, of that day. And many are inclined to forget the heroism, dignity and resilience with which America met that attack. Memories of the dedication of public servants in the police and fire services, the spontaneous generosity of citizens towards those in need and the measured resolve of Americas political leadership to respond wisely, have all been superseded in the rest of the worlds media by new waves of criticism. No longer the wounded hero, Uncle Sam has become an Aunt Sally.

    Corporate sleaze, bruised European amour propre, economic tremors, Middle East sniping and intellectual sneering all fuel a resurgent anti-Americanism that brings together in curious alliance the Observer columnist Will Hutton, Jean-Marie Le Pen, The Guardians George Monbiot, Clare Short and Chris Patten.

    But their disdain will not detract one iota from the pride in their country that millions of Americans will assert today. And quite rightly. For on this Independence Day all those of us who believe in personal independence from tyranny, poverty, racism, repression, puritanism, penal taxation and terror can salute the country that has advanced our freedoms even as it has so vigorously defended its own.

    No country, even ones own, deserves to be defended right or wrong. America has made mistakes, sometimes criminal ones. And any citizen of the United Kingdom is bound to find aspects of life Stateside not just disorientating but downright distasteful in comparison with the more settled rhythms of British existence.

    But the values America has, sometimes imperfectly, sought to embody, defend and extend deserve to be applauded. As a nation, the United States is more open, vital, creative, free, diverse and healthily democratic than any other on earth. Britain may be more stable, earthed and charming. Australia may have much of Americas openness with a healthier population, freer of conceit. Europes smaller nations such as The Netherlands and Denmark may have succeeded in building greater social solidarity while still preserving personal freedom. But no nation has the sheer innovative energy, the democratic vitality, the openness to personal growth and the willingness to shoulder burdens bigger than itself that America has.

    Freedom is hard-wired into the American way of life as a lived reality, not an abstract aspiration. Although first settled by Puritans, the real fathers of America are the drafters of its Declaration of Independence and founding Constitution. They established a set of principles for government that have made America the most resilient laboratory for, and champion of, freedom in the world.

    Those principles have made America a beacon. Throughout its history America has been the hope, and destination, for those suffering oppression and seeking independence. From the original religious dissidents who set sail in the Mayflower, through the Irish fleeing famine, the Scots cleared from the Highlands, the Scandinavians escaping indigence, the Italians putting poverty and brigandage behind them, the Jewish populations of Eastern Europe driven out by pogroms to the Mexicans seeking work and opportunity and the Vietnamese made refugees by communism, the citizens of the States have been United in their experience of struggling towards freedom. Liberty has been more than a Statue greeting Americas peoples, it has been the prize enjoyed every day by those who breathe its air.

    Freedoms trailblazers in the last 200 years have much more often than not been Americans. From the stand against sexual oppression taken at Stonewall, to the practical feminism of Gurley Brown, Jong and Steinem to the economic emancipation promoted by Rand, Friedman and von Mises, freedom in all its colours has been most vigorously promoted in America.

    That freedom has, in turn, brought a cultural richness in the past century greater than any other nations. In the modern arts film, urban architecture, pop music, live comedy America is pre-eminent. In more traditional forms, such as the novel, the achievements of Hemingway, Bellow, Updike, Roth, Walker, Wolfe and Delillo dwarf competitors. The accusations of philistine barbarity and commercial crassness flung at Americans seem preposterous set beside the quality of, and attendance at, Americas great galleries and the profusion of contemporary literary and aesthetic comment in magazines as diverse as New Criterion and The New York Review of Books. All these are the fruits of the liberty tree.

    Americas record of freedom has been blighted, most notably by the experience of slavery, but what must amaze any fair-minded observer is the capacity of the USA, as an open society, to learn from its collective errors and remould itself as a better place for individuals. The Civil Rights movement of the early Sixties has become the template for all responsible equality movements worldwide. Martin Luther Kings dream of a future in which colour would not matter, and men would be judged on merit, is the ruling principle of American life and the vision to which the rest of the world still aspires. The USA now has two African-Americans in the Cabinet, an African-American in the Supreme Court and African-Americans in charge of major companies such as Amex, AOL and Goldman Sachs. No other society in the world has the openness to talent which America now boasts, none has integrated a racial mix as rich as Americas so successfully.

    It may be a record with stains in the past but it is one of which Americans can be proud now. But that pride is increasingly seen by many as overweening. A majority of 17 to 22-year-olds in a recent poll declared the USA arrogant, inward-looking and aggressive. Their reaction is encouraged, and reflected, by politicians and commentators who have taken to chiding America for its hyperpower hubris.

    The pre-eminent economic success of America is not seen as a happy reflection of free markets, free expression, meritocracy and diversity but the bullying application of superior weight. The unchallengeable military superiority of America is seen not as a consequence of economic growth, husbanded carefully and deployed sparingly in the cause of freedom, but a lead-weighted truncheon in the hands of a world policeman turned bent copper.

    In both cases the resentment articulated by the anti-American alliance of Huttons, Pattens, Shorts and Le Pens is not moral but ideological. They resent American economic success because it reminds them that their preferred cocktails of protectionism, state regulation, subsidy and intervention constrict growth. Americas practical success is a standing rebuke to their abstract beliefs.

    The same crew resents American military prowess because they have either lost faith in the nation state as a guardian of freedom or their vision of the nation state is closed, restrictive and anti-liberal. America is simultaneously chided for aggression and isolationism what that confusion reveals is irritation that American power exists because of that nations self-belief and anguish that power is not subordinated to their control. Accusations of imperial arrogance flung at America are not borne out by any colonising instinct on the part of the US. American force will come down heavily on those who threaten its citizens, it can be deployed to remove tyrannies, reverse invasions and roll back oppression. But there is no desire among Americans to see their flag fly permanently over any soil but their own. Having helped nations be free, they have no desire then to subdue them to their will.

    And no need. For Americas greatest victories are not won on battlefields, but in our homes, streets and imaginations. Those who deprecate the USs vulgarity and arrogance daily affirm America is best in the trainers and jeans they wear, the coffee and food they consume, the films that let their minds take flight and the books that give their contemporary lives context. Respect and affection for America are not the mark of those who dislike their home country, but those who wish their fellow citizens to enjoy the richness, diversity, freedom and self-confidence that have made America great.

    Then there is the opposing viewpoint:

    ... and why I don't: the USA is a selfish bully
    by Ziauddin Sardar
    Our correspondent argues that the US bullies and exploits the rest of the world
    When cheering for America, consider this. The US has 3 per cent of the worlds population yet consumes more than 30 per cent of global resources. The three richest Americans have assets exceeding the combined GDP of the 48 least developed countries. What Americans spend on cosmetics $8 billion a year is $2 billion more than the total needed to provide basic education worldwide. Add what the US spends on pet food alone, and we can meet the basic health and nutrition requirements of all of the worlds poor.

    Americas lifestyle is sustained at the expense of the rest of the world. As a hyperpower, commanding the greatest constellation of military, political, economic and cultural power ever assembled, America has structured the world to suit its own ends.

    The US controls the World Bank, World Trade Organisation and IMF, denying democratic control over their own economic destinies to more than two thirds of the worlds population. It interprets trade liberalisation as one-way access for US multinationals and businesses. It has imposed massive tariffs on agricultural products such as rice, sugar and coffee, and works constantly to bring down commodity prices that are essential for the survival of many of the worlds poorest countries. While Americans produce 25 per cent of the worlds pollution, the US refuses to sign the Kyoto Accords, which means that you and I, and most of the developing countries, will have to suffer the consequences of global warming.

    American corporations are set to dominate global provision of healthcare, welfare, pensions, education, food and water. In other words, most people in the developing countries will soon be buying the basic necessities of life from American corporations. They spearhead the development of GM technology, research and development of gene therapies, and genetic medicine the very building blocks of all life. All these advances are patented for profit by corporations whose culture we know, from recent scandals at Enron, WorldCom and Xerox, to be riddled with fraud, greed and possibly criminal creative accounting. To advance opportunities for its corporations, America has consistently and repeatedly intervened in the internal affairs of nation after nation.

    US foreign policy operates solely in the interests of America. It has abrogated the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, redefined nuclear weapons protocols to permit tactical battlefield usage and exempted itself from the new World Court for human rights. It has dragooned nations into a world coalition against terror, yet only Americas definition of terror, a unitary evil without reference to history or context, applies.

    While America affects the life of all peoples and nations, Americans themselves know less and receive less news and information about the rest of the world than any comparable society. The closed circle that is the American self-image makes peaceful, reasoned debate with America tantamount to armed assault. Never has a nation been so powerful and so insecure; so self-confident yet so paranoid; so self-centred as to believe that its way is, in the words of Abraham Lincoln, the last best hope for mankind.

    Every Fourth of July the US celebrates what its 19th century politicians called Americas manifest destiny as the great nation of futurity. It offers all non-Americans the choice it gave then to the Native Americans: learn the American way or vanish, be marginalised, become powerless and invisible.

    The Fourth of July is based on the philosophy of no taxation without representation. The US now benefits from a net transfer of resources and wealth from the rest of the world. We have a new King George to deal with. So perhaps we should contemplate what the world could be without Americas Fourth of July. Or consider creating a Fourth of July for the rest of the world!

    Pasted by Englishman.

  • Shimmer
    Shimmer

    Bravo to you for posting that wonderful article celebrating the uniqueness of the USA. We're not the greatest country in the world, but we are special in our own way. And this country has been good to me and my Scottish ancestors who were cleared out of the highlands.

    Shimmer

  • new boy
    new boy

    Thank you for your post.

    Are there two things that separates the planet more then politics or religion?

    I personally am looking forward to day when neither is around.

    The greatest world powers that have ever be on this earth, are all nothing now.

    God bless America.

    Happy 4th of July.

  • invisible
    invisible

    Seeing clearly both sides of the coin with these written sentiments, I admit its a love hate relationship I have with the USA. In many ways, I despair too of British policy decisions, many of which are just as damaging on the global front, yet still, to have enough wisdom, often learn't through painful lessons, teaches me that people probaly are the same just about wherever you go, and its important, nay, paramount, to still consider individuals rather than lumping everyone together under the same collective banner. Perhaps it is jealousy on my part, jealousy of American policies, their attitudes and their way of life that gets my goat and the often, more absurd British way of approaching these same said problems.

    I therefore wholeheartedly apologise for my previous held opinion, which is now being adjusted to represent a clearer picture on my part, sorry for any offense howsoever caused.

    Thankyou for posting these articles Englishman.

    Mark

  • Englishman
    Englishman

    Way to go, Celtic!

    Englishman.

  • ISP
    ISP

    Celtic.....you are one strange person.

    ISP

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    The United States has prospered because its two largest neighbors are the Atlantic and the Pacific.

  • DakotaRed
    DakotaRed

    Thank you for an insightful article. But, a point brought up I would like to address towards all the America Bashers out there;

    The US has 3 per cent of the worlds population yet consumes more than 30 per cent of global resources.

    We purchase these resources on an open market. No one else is denied any of these resources or blocked from purchasing them either. So, if we weren't buying them, who else would? If America stopped buying all these resources, what would the supplying nations economies do? Would they falter and fail?

    When complaining that America uses so much resources, stop and think how our purchases help smaller nations to have an economy themselves.

    Lew W

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    Dakota:

    The US has been too willing to do business with ruling elites who fail to share the money with their fellow countrymen. The US trains the police and secret service in other countries so they can effectively beat down their population and keep them from revolting or joining labor unions.

    Purchasing raw materials does very little for a country's economy UNLESS the money is invested in building local infrastructure and developing local business. Marcos, Batista, Shah of Iran, Saud family of Saudi Arabia, Somosa and others were wicked men who spent the money they got from the United States on their little cliques and gave only token help to their poor masses. The United States doesn't listen to anyone without nuclear weapons.

    You are expressing a typical narrow American attitude. You need to do a little investigation.

  • Nikita
    Nikita

    Thank you Englishman! You have given me more to think about in terms of the "global perspective".

    Nikita

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit